Congratulations. You no longer have access to the court system.
The problem with the snarky, knee jerk response to class actions that you have is that most class actions are instances where individuals aren't harmed for much, but together it's quite significant.
And I have absolutely no faith in private arbitration to do anything but find for the entity paying their fees.
Actually, you're a provider to Equifax, in the form of the data trail they're ingesting.
A pretty good WashPo item (by way of Outline because fuck WP's nagwall) spelling this out:
Funny how "Fuck you, pay me" is an acceptable sentiment when you're a freelance software dev, but now when you're a journalistic institution.
NY Times has a similarly annoying practice of disabling copy/paste from articles (trivial to get around on various browsers, but not Chrome/Android), so I frequently point to Outline for that as well.
I sympathise with the problems of publishers. But I've also done a lot of research and thinking on this, and they're fundamentally fighting a losing war.
Either go fully behind a paywall (and suffer the consequences of that), go nonprofit (see ProPublica, ICIJ, NPR/PBS), find a patronage option, or ... well, I don't know.
But the system we've got (and which a great many HN folk are directly participating in, as I have myself) SIMPLY. IS. NOT. WORKING.
(It's one of a bunch of things that aren't working presently, though it ties in to many of the others in particularly distressing ways.)
A topic I've addressed (and cited people who do not manifest on the Internet as Space Alien Cats, including Joseph Stiglitz) numerous times. And you can read for free!
https://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/search?q=information+ma...
Or this yesterday on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15540536
How am I considered a consumer of Equifax? Aren't the consumers the people that use Equifax to check my credit? When did I ever enter into an agreement with Equifax that binds me to arbitration?