News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by abhi3 on Monday October 09, 2017 @09:04AM (#15433432)
The first time SpaceX landed a booster we had 1284 upvotes 432 comments (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10774865), in less than two years it has become so routine that this submission has just 22 point and 4 comments.

Makes me wonder if one-day lunches to Mars and intra-planetary travel via BFR will also become so routine :)

Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by kharms on Monday October 09, 2017 @09:14AM (#15433476)
Trips to Mars have a launch window every two years, so the inter-planatary BFR launches will remain a BFD indefinitely. :)

Edit: citation http://athena.cornell.edu/mars_facts/sb_launch_window.html

Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by krisroadruck on Monday October 09, 2017 @10:33AM (#15434097)
This depends largely on advances in propulsion. It's convenient to launch to mars every 2 years from a fuel efficiency standpoint, but there is no reason why we can't go there at any other time, other than current propulsion limits. At a constant 1G acceleration (including a flip over at the halfway mark for equal 1G deceleration), even at its farthest distance from earth, we could reach it in under 5 days. You even get artificial gravity as a bonus.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_travel_using_constant_ac...

Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by olegkikin on Monday October 09, 2017 @11:01AM (#15434330)
Only problem is, 1G acceleration for 5 days straight is pure fiction at this point.
Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by Narretz on Monday October 09, 2017 @09:18AM (#15433504)
Overall, this is a good thing. What's bad is that the next time a rocket doesn't make the landing (or worse, cannot submit the payload), this will be all over the news as a failure. At least in Germany, a failure would get a mention on the frontpage of tagesschau.de (portal of the state-sponsored media channel), while a success doesn't.
Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by avar on Monday October 09, 2017 @09:31AM (#15433601)
If Lufthansa crashes a plane tomorrow in Berlin that'll also make the German news, while them flying hundreds of flights a day doesn't make it because it's not noteworthy.

It's the news because it's notable or out of the ordinary.

Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by grecy on Monday October 09, 2017 @09:52AM (#15433756)
> It's the news because it's notable or out of the ordinary.

While that may once have been true, what consists of "news" today is simply whatever will grab people's attention. It's all about ratings.

It certainly does not have to be notable or out of the ordinary.

Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by Gargoyle on Monday October 09, 2017 @09:24AM (#15433546)
Well, the thread also started at 5:30 am California time!
Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by electriclove on Monday October 09, 2017 @10:37AM (#15434120)
Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by the-dude on Monday October 09, 2017 @08:47AM (#15433342)
Already landed. I was worried the engine would not cut off ( took > 10 seconds ).
Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by ctdonath on Monday October 09, 2017 @09:56AM (#15433797)
Video recorded at night. Probably normal residual burn, normally not noticeable in bright sunlight.
Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by imglorp on Monday October 09, 2017 @08:58AM (#15433407)
Is it possibly intentional? Eg maybe they started burning at idle thrust after landing, to empty out the tanks instead of just venting them?
Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by arctor_bob on Monday October 09, 2017 @09:13AM (#15433474)
There's no "idle thrust" on Falcon 9 since even the lowest thrust is enough to lift the almost empty booster. You also don't want to completely run out of fuel because your engine will probably explode. This was just a residual fire.
Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by antsar on Monday October 09, 2017 @12:09PM (#15435069)
> You also don't want to completely run out of fuel because your engine will probably explode.

Can anyone suggest keywords/links about this? Sounds interesting.

Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by msl on Monday October 09, 2017 @12:27PM (#15435231)
One problem here would probably be turbopumps [1] running dry. These things run very close to their limits when fully stressed and would presumably run higher still if they no longer needed to pressurize anything.

The fuel is also used as a coolant [2] so you would not want to run out of fuel in the plumbing before you run out of propellants in the combustion chamber.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbopump

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merlin_(rocket_engine_family) (search "regeneratively cooled")

Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by the-dude on Monday October 09, 2017 @08:59AM (#15433409)
I am not a rocket scientist ( IANARS ? )
Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by eecc on Monday October 09, 2017 @09:15AM (#15433487)
Fill soundtrack is pretty listenable... anyone know who's it is?
Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by gliptic on Monday October 09, 2017 @09:43AM (#15433678)
http://www.spacexfm.com/ is a good site.
Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by neosilky_ on Monday October 09, 2017 @09:48AM (#15433732)
And "view-source" for an extensive list of tracks.
Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by Klathmon on Monday October 09, 2017 @09:25AM (#15433552)
The artist they normally use for their webcasts is "TEST SHOT STARFISH".
Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by SoulMan on Monday October 09, 2017 @11:42AM (#15434796)
I read somewhere the new Iridium sats have less reflective antennas so we will probably miss the majestic flares that we see in sky.
Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by gregtaleck on Monday October 09, 2017 @02:47PM (#15436388)
http://www.skyandtelescope.com/observing/get-your-iridium-fi...

""" "I have been photographing Iridium flares since 1997 from various parts of the world. In fact, I was the one who first discovered the source of the flares after working with engineers at Motorola that year. I have gone so far as making a bar bet with people, advertising Iridium flares at international aerospace conferences, and emailing predictions to other overseas before there were web pages that allowed easy access to flare times." — Paul Maley, NASA Johnson Space Center Astronomical Society

Sadly, that era will soon draw to a close. On January 14th, SpaceX’s Falcon 9 delivered the first 10 of a new generation of Iridium NEXT satellites to low-Earth orbit, starting the process to replace the older units in a maneuver called slot-swapping. While the new birds will provide faster data rates and enhanced global communications, their antenna design is completely different and not expected to produce significant flares. """

Re:SpaceX Iridium-3 Mission Launching Streaming by dEnigma on Monday October 09, 2017 @08:48AM (#15433348)
My heart beat like crazy right before the landing of the first stage, always a thrill to watch.