Re:Inside Uber’s new approach to employee performance reviews
by fizx on Tuesday August 01, 2017 @07:36PM
(#14906516)
They're probably counting e.g. SWEIII with an intern. Still, I'm more amazed that a single person has done feedback session with 9000 people in two months ;)
Re:Inside Uber’s new approach to employee performance reviews
by dozzie on Tuesday August 01, 2017 @08:14PM
(#14906727)
Two months are around 40 business days, which gives over 200 people per day,
or one person every two minutes. The only way this would be possible is when
he did mostly collective sessions, which heavily undermines the impressivness
of the feat.
Re:Inside Uber’s new approach to employee performance reviews
by asteli on Tuesday August 01, 2017 @08:56PM
(#14906962)
*she
Re:Inside Uber’s new approach to employee performance reviews
by grafporno on Tuesday August 01, 2017 @11:45PM
(#14907753)
My guess would be that the "conducting" sessions actually means sending out 9000 emails with a link to a survey.
Re:Inside Uber’s new approach to employee performance reviews
by mathattack on Wednesday August 02, 2017 @09:16AM
(#14910259)
Probably some heavy delegation.
Re:Inside Uber’s new approach to employee performance reviews
by seattle_spring on Tuesday August 01, 2017 @07:37PM
(#14906522)
A manager can also be a report. I assume that statistic includes middle managers, such as group managers, directors, etc.
Ex:
* Director might have 3 group manager reports
* Each group manager might have 3 manager reports
* Each manager might have 4 engineer reports
In the above example, we have 10 managers and 36 engineers, which isn't too far off from the 25% management statistic.
Re:Inside Uber’s new approach to employee performance reviews
by asteli on Tuesday August 01, 2017 @08:55PM
(#14906958)
I'm parsing this as: "Of the 9000 employees that attended sessions, 3000 were managers."
Re:Inside Uber’s new approach to employee performance reviews
by traek on Tuesday August 01, 2017 @10:06PM
(#14907325)
Yes, that is the correct way to parse it. That implies that Uber has at least 3k managers, possibly more.
OP was commenting that >3k managers seems like a high proportion of their ~12k total employees.
3/~12k [1] employees are managers? That sounds really management-heavy, or did I misinterpret that?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uber_(company)