News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Damn Small Linux by zach43 on Saturday July 29, 2017 @07:33PM (#14883540)
Could I also suggest Tiny Core Linux [0]? It still seems to be in active development, and the ISO which includes the kernel, shell, and window manager (FLWM, based off FLTK) weighs in at only 16mb in total. It's pretty impressive, and its good fun to play around with in a VM.

[0] http://www.tinycorelinux.net

Re:Damn Small Linux by et2o on Saturday July 29, 2017 @08:53PM (#14883820)
This was written by a former DSL co-founder/developer. It's quite an interesting story! There is an interview with him here: http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20090323&mode=68#fea...
Re:Damn Small Linux by limeblack on Saturday July 29, 2017 @08:33PM (#14883767)
I actually ran this distro to do nodejs development for a while in a VM before they had windows support. It beats Cygwin and still is fast.
Re:Damn Small Linux by mysterydip on Saturday July 29, 2017 @07:36PM (#14883553)
Agreed. It became my standard choice for micro linux installs over puppy, nano, dsl, etc.
Re:Damn Small Linux by contingencies on Saturday July 29, 2017 @07:37PM (#14883556)
To learn about embedded/headless/obscure-hardware Linux I would suggest checking out http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/ instead or using a distribution like http://www.gentoo.org/ for awhile to get familiar with lower level concepts and building custom systems. Customize kernel options until things break, try at least one embedded platform, and build a PXE diskless boot system.
Re:Damn Small Linux by bluejekyll on Saturday July 29, 2017 @09:07PM (#14883862)
I ran Gentoo for years. I finally decided that it took too much time to maintain it, went with a simpler system.
Re:Damn Small Linux by khedoros1 on Saturday July 29, 2017 @10:25PM (#14884075)
Ditto. Compile time was pretty killer. But between my years spent running Slackware then Gentoo, I feel like I got a good feel for the core of how Linux systems should operate (and the benefit of someone else running the builds!)
Re:Damn Small Linux by Darkenetor on Saturday July 29, 2017 @09:00PM (#14883835)
Another still actively developed alternative is SliTaz [0].

Comes in images from 45Mb for a working desktop down to a bootable floppy, rolling release, runs in RAM with no persistence by default, and uses a custom package manager that, outside of having its own decently sized repo, can convert packages from Debian, RPM, Slax, Puppy, Slackware, NuTyX, Arch, Alpine, OpenWrt, 0Linux, paldo, Void and Tinycore according to the manual.

[0] http://www.slitaz.org/en/about/

Re:Damn Small Linux by nerflad on Saturday July 29, 2017 @07:43PM (#14883570)
Man, this brings back some middle school memories of back when my biggest USB drive was 128MB and I was playing with Linux live images for the first time. Sad to see why and how the project died.
Re:Damn Small Linux by schuetze on Saturday July 29, 2017 @08:16PM (#14883706)
It looks like DSL's website hasn't been updated since I found out about it 10 years ago.
Re:Damn Small Linux by LukeShu on Saturday July 29, 2017 @08:41PM (#14883791)
And DSL itself hasn't been updated since 5 years ago (the most recent release candidate was in 2012).
Re:Damn Small Linux by Haul4ss on Saturday July 29, 2017 @07:19PM (#14883495)
I also remember LOAF - Linux on a Floppy

I'm not sure I even have any floppy disks laying around, much less a drive to put them in!

Re:Damn Small Linux by wrycoder on Saturday July 29, 2017 @09:05PM (#14883856)
There is still Tom's root boot, which fits on a 1.44MB floppy, if you still have a drive accessible.

http://www.toms.net/rb/

Re:Damn Small Linux by PrimHelios on Sunday July 30, 2017 @12:30AM (#14884452)
Funnily enough, I just got one. I know what I'm doing this week!
Re:Damn Small Linux by rmsaksida on Saturday July 29, 2017 @07:46PM (#14883583)
Puppy Linux is still around as well. http://puppylinux.org/
Re:Damn Small Linux by warrenm on Saturday July 29, 2017 @07:04PM (#14883433)
I didn't even know DSL was still around
Re:Damn Small Linux by colechristensen on Saturday July 29, 2017 @07:09PM (#14883445)
It looks like DSL died 9 years ago due to some infighting

http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/static/act-ST/f-4/t-20537.1.ht...

Doesn't seem to have much activity since then.

Re:Damn Small Linux by loeg on Saturday July 29, 2017 @07:36PM (#14883550)
Last time I used DSL, I believe it was running a 2.4 Linux kernel. I guess it still is, but it was slightly less obsolete at the time.

Another fun 2.4 Linux embedded distro is eMoviX — small enough you can put it on a CD with a movie, and boot the system off the CD to play it.

Re:Damn Small Linux by nhumrich on Saturday July 29, 2017 @08:29PM (#14883754)
Alpine linux is smaller than this.
Re:Damn Small Linux by dnautics on Saturday July 29, 2017 @08:37PM (#14883781)
It's 8mb in a container, which is crazy good.
Re:Damn Small Linux by justbaker on Saturday July 29, 2017 @11:21PM (#14884280)
Omg yes alpine Linux is amazing
Re:Damn Small Linux by ingenieroariel on Saturday July 29, 2017 @08:23PM (#14883734)
I used this 15 years ago from a 128Mb USB stick. It was my introduction to linux and set the bar really high for responsiveness. I think I even installed Windows 98 second edition on a computer running Windows XP just to feel the same.
Re:Damn Small Linux by geofft on Saturday July 29, 2017 @08:04PM (#14883654)
If this is really kernel 2.4 and hasn't been touched since then, it's probably made out of remote root exploits at this point.
Re:Damn Small Linux by LukeShu on Saturday July 29, 2017 @08:43PM (#14883797)
DSL hasn't been updated since 2012. But even when it was still under active development, they made the controversial decision that they would never ship 2.6 because it was just too big and bloated; and that all of the important bits would be backported to 2.4, because surely there were enough people sticking with 2.4 that it would be supported forever, right?
Re:Damn Small Linux by h1d on Saturday July 29, 2017 @07:20PM (#14883497)
Why is this randomly posted?
Re:Damn Small Linux by em3rgent0rdr on Saturday July 29, 2017 @07:48PM (#14883592)
Every couple years these things get posted by people who have discovered then for the first time, and then get voted up by those same people or by people who have a fondness for it.
Re:Damn Small Linux by milesf on Saturday July 29, 2017 @08:36PM (#14883777)
I welcome the up voting of these sorts of things. It's great to see projects with new eyes, and be reminded that not everyone has the same historical experiences that I've had.
Re:Damn Small Linux by amingilani on Saturday July 29, 2017 @07:47PM (#14883586)
My thought exactly. It's been a long time since it was updated. It's a nice historical once-popular distro, but this post feels kinda random.
Re:Damn Small Linux by dredmorbius on Saturday July 29, 2017 @08:05PM (#14883658)
Please don't submit comments complaining that a submission is inappropriate for the site. If you think a story is spam or off-topic, flag it by clicking on its 'flag' link. If you think a comment is egregious, click on its timestamp to go to its page, then click 'flag' at the top. (Not all users see flag links; there's a small karma threshold.)

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Damn Small Linux by yellowapple on Saturday July 29, 2017 @08:07PM (#14883667)
I remember using DSL quite a bit back when I was first playing around with Linux. It was the only desktop-oriented Linux distro that seemed to actually run on my Compaq Presario 1210 (Tiny Core didn't even exist back then, and even when I did eventually try it, it choked on the laptop's weird graphics card). Pretty much nothing else was able to fit in the laptop's "whopping" 32MB or so of RAM (aside from Windows 2000 and older, as well as FreeDOS).