I don't think OP was supporting the actions one way or another, but objectively stating information that is relevant to OP's question. It's relevant because it's a case of cryptocurrency working it's way into the 'real world'. It was never implemented, so the only important thing here is that someone who a lot of people listen to actually proposed using cryptocurrency, politics don't factor into it.

I get your point I am just saying that he is a known political clown and that would never be implemented so it's just as good as you and me devising a plan like that.