Re:The Texas Instruments 99/4: World’s First 16-Bit Computer
by Frogolocalypse on Monday June 26, 2017 @11:29PM
(#14642374)
I shudder to think how many hours I spent on that game. But even that paled in comparison to Tunnels of Doom.
Re:The Texas Instruments 99/4: World’s First 16-Bit Computer
by stan_rogers on Tuesday June 27, 2017 @12:06AM
(#14642502)
I wasted an alarmingly large percentage of a year or thereabouts on that game. And that was depite having the expansion chassis, floppy drives, the assembler card and Advanced Basic (all of which also ate a huge chunk of time).
Re:The Texas Instruments 99/4: World’s First 16-Bit Computer
by MichaelMoser123 on Monday June 26, 2017 @09:25PM
(#14641870)
i think TI basic was much easier than comodore basic; (still it really needed that extension cartridge)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TI_BASIC_(TI_99/4A)
Also it turns out that the interpreter was slow because it was written in an interpreted language, but it was good enough for simple games because they had built-in sprites.
Interesting that they have emulators/simulators for it.
http://www.99er.net/emul.shtml http://www.99er.net/win994a.shtml
Re:The Texas Instruments 99/4: World’s First 16-Bit Computer
by SuperGent on Tuesday June 27, 2017 @07:14AM
(#14644259)
I too started on TI BASIC, which taught me a lot, including ASCII, hex, binary, function calls, debugging the lists from magazines and how to type. I think I could type 'Call CLear' faster than anyone I knew!
It's a pity I didn't get into ASM until years later when I got a spectrum.
Re:The Texas Instruments 99/4: World’s First 16-Bit Computer
by flomo on Tuesday June 27, 2017 @02:32AM
(#14642954)
No idea if this is true, but the meme was that you could only write BASIC for the TI99, assembly was forbidden somehow. For the most part, hackers avoided this system like the plague, despite all the advertisements starring Bill Cosby.
Re:The Texas Instruments 99/4: World’s First 16-Bit Computer
by pmiller2 on Tuesday June 27, 2017 @02:38AM
(#14642972)
100% not true. There was an editor/assembler cartridge that let you program in ASM.
Re:The Texas Instruments 99/4: World’s First 16-Bit Computer
by nsxwolf on Wednesday June 28, 2017 @01:18AM
(#14651861)
Your other option was the Mini Memory cartridge, which added a scaled down version of Editor/Assembler as well as 8K of RAM and a battery backup.
It was an economical way to dabble in assembly without springing for the 32K RAM expansion and disk system.
Re:The Texas Instruments 99/4: World’s First 16-Bit Computer
by T-hawk on Tuesday June 27, 2017 @11:01AM
(#14645992)
It had very little adoption and mindshare, though. All the assembly hackers were on the C-64, Apple II, and a bit later the PC.
Re:The Texas Instruments 99/4: World’s First 16-Bit Computer
by smoyer on Monday June 26, 2017 @09:56PM
(#14642005)
I also had a TI99-4A ... It was a lot of fun to play with but I was also programming uProcessors in assembly language and that CPU's instruction set (and caveats) were so non-standard it was like learning it all over again.
Re:The Texas Instruments 99/4: World’s First 16-Bit Computer
by T-hawk on Tuesday June 27, 2017 @11:05AM
(#14646026)
I got good enough at Parsec to go infinite (earn lives faster than losing them) and roll over the score: http://dos486.com/misc/parsec.jpg
Fun fact: even though the manual says the sequence of level colors repeats after 16, it doesn't. It just stays yellow from level 16 onwards, through at least level 24 or so.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsec_(video_game)