Re:By installing NAT, MIT stifles innovation
by compuguy on Monday June 26, 2017 @03:43PM
(#14639675)
Honestly that sounds like a better alternative, than hosting on bare metal.
Re:By installing NAT, MIT stifles innovation
by imjustapie on Monday June 26, 2017 @03:59PM
(#14639839)
By default the service max out at 512 MB of RAM (yes, the service was invented in a different decade, way before AWS was cool). So if I want anything more than that, I'm better off running my own server.
Also ironically, I can't reach any of the newly NAT'd networks from my XVM instance. I bet the XVM maintainers haven't been warned about the NAT.
Re:By installing NAT, MIT stifles innovation
by compuguy on Tuesday June 27, 2017 @10:35AM
(#14645736)
Did not know that. Honestly MIT's IT department should of given stakeholders more notice about this. I've honestly never had the chance to work on a public facing network (My alma mater, GMU, has a mostly natted network).
http://xvm.mit.edu/