News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on By installing NAT, MIT stifles innovation. Parent comment

Re:By installing NAT, MIT stifles innovation by imjustapie on Monday June 26, 2017 @03:59PM (#14639839)
By default the service max out at 512 MB of RAM (yes, the service was invented in a different decade, way before AWS was cool). So if I want anything more than that, I'm better off running my own server.

Also ironically, I can't reach any of the newly NAT'd networks from my XVM instance. I bet the XVM maintainers haven't been warned about the NAT.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:By installing NAT, MIT stifles innovation by compuguy on Tuesday June 27, 2017 @10:35AM (#14645736)
Did not know that. Honestly MIT's IT department should of given stakeholders more notice about this. I've honestly never had the chance to work on a public facing network (My alma mater, GMU, has a mostly natted network).
[ Parent | on HN ]