Re:As Computer Coding Classes Swell, So Does Cheating
by stale2002 on Tuesday May 30, 2017 @03:10AM
(#14443414)
But even then, you'd be surprised how many people don't even do that.....
Even so, I usually ask something that is barely more difficult, like traverse a tree, or reverse a sentence.
There is no point at all in asking the hardcore, Google interview questions, as a simple question tells you just as much, which is "do you have a pulse".
Re:As Computer Coding Classes Swell, So Does Cheating
by flamedoge on Tuesday May 30, 2017 @03:55AM
(#14443604)
I got asked compiler question once. How to find dominators. I haven't had to find dominators for a very long time other than from a college course, mostly only used them. Looking it up, it's definitely not something you can come up with because it's so clever.
Re:As Computer Coding Classes Swell, So Does Cheating
by tonyedgecombe on Tuesday May 30, 2017 @04:44AM
(#14443769)
Those questions tell you more about the interviewer than the interviewee.
Re:As Computer Coding Classes Swell, So Does Cheating
by mafribe on Tuesday May 30, 2017 @05:46AM
(#14444058)
Was this interview for a compiler position?
Anyway, dominators make sense for arbitrary directed graphs (with a notion of root).
Re:As Computer Coding Classes Swell, So Does Cheating
by flamedoge on Tuesday May 30, 2017 @06:16AM
(#14444180)
yea, but for a target dependent backend position.
Re:As Computer Coding Classes Swell, So Does Cheating
by emidln on Tuesday May 30, 2017 @11:05AM
(#14445850)
If a candidate can google the problem, understand it, and then learn how to write a simple variation of it they have demonstrated all the skills necessary to be a useful coder at an awful lot of companies. I'd kinda prefer them to learn basic programming a little more ahead of time, but I honestly don't care when you learn how to program.
Somebody who can't do Fizzbuzz in an interview has literally done zero preparation for that interview.