I really want to meet the person that thinks a $35k car is going to be better than a $100k car...
Well, there seems to be a misconception that there are hordes of people who are legitimately confused about the subject.
Trust me, you don't ..
Re:Tesla Model S and Model 3 comparison
by BoorishBears on Friday May 26, 2017 @11:40AM
(#14424819)
I'm a tiny bit surprised there isn't a Model S2/Model S3/Model S4/etc.
Re:Tesla Model S and Model 3 comparison
by GoatHerderson on Friday May 26, 2017 @10:01AM
(#14424082)
For what you get, $100,000 is a complete rip-off.
Now if you are buying exotic cars, sure, $100,000 is nothing.
The only other $100k+ car I've ever driven is a Range Rover. So I'm not an expert, but I feel like the Model S is considerably "more for the money". Faster acceleration, no gas, large screen, etc. I realize that's not why people buy Range Rovers, but my point is that even with most things being subjective, you can't reasonably call a Model S "a complete rip-off".
As Musk said via Twitter, the Model S is on Gen. 4, and continues to offer the most advanced technologies.
That said, most people are waiting for the Model 3 because they can't (or do want to) afford a $100,000-$165,000 (with the self-driving packages) vehicle.