At this point it's essentially impossible to make a credible claim that Russia did not compromise the DNC network. At best you could try to argue that they weren't the only ones to do so, but that feels like grasping at straws.
https://weaponizedautism.wordpress.com/2017/04/09/trump-dns-...
To be fair, the criticisms were that they were hired by the DNC after the DNC dragged their feet on giving the FBI access. For some reason they gave this firm the right of way. The original report has also since been revised and had portions retracted... So it wasn't a gold standard of evidence to begin with.
To be fair there are many respectable people (who are strongly anti-Trump) questioning this[1].
1-https://theintercept.com/2016/12/14/heres-the-public-evidenc...
Source: I'm a member of the security research community.
There's no definitive proof, there's evidence. This is as definitive as it gets, we've got a report by some of the best people in the field that's also been corroborated by the US DHS.
I'm sure this is far better evidence than anything that exists to the contrary, people get convicted on shakier grounds every day.
It is not disputable that DNC servers were infected by Russian government malware.
Last time I checked the DHS hasn't seen the server yet.
Because the signatures of 'Russian government malware' were found? Same signatures we recently found CIA can (and does) easily fake?
Was the initial report they retracted more or less definitive?
Remember the Iraq War was also started with lies corroborated by the US Gvt and the courts did not pose an obstacle to it...
I dont care if men eith epilletes tell me so. I want to see the proof.
At this point you're just trolling.
>The company removed language that said Ukraine's artillery lost 80 percent of the Soviet-era D-30 howitzers, which used aiming software that purportedly was hacked. Instead, the revised report cites figures of 15 to 20 percent losses in combat operations, attributing the figures to IISS.
The founder of Crowdstrike, Dimitri Alperovitch is a Senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. The Atlantic Council is funded by a guy named Victor Pinchuk who is a Ukrainian (and dislikes Russia), and he donated $25 million to the Clinton Foundation. (story found here: http://archive.is/DUtMN ). Furthermore (read the first link) the DHS report about the DNC hack given after a FOIA request amounted to TWO PAGES with information anyone could have googled from the internet.
If you just look at the wikipedia for the Atlantic Council ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Council ) it states several members have left the organization to work for the Obama Administration including Susan Rice. Susan Rice as you all know illegally unmasked members of the Trump campaign to hinder his presidency.
Finally I believe this article is very important: http://archive.is/DUtMN it shows the cozy relationship Victor Pinchuk had with the Clinton state department.
DNC, Podesta and Hillary's got totally fucking pwnd by NSA's stolen virus arsenal. They were the Shadowbrokers very first target.
The whole "muh Russia" narrative is a big fat lie to cover for NSA's ass blowing in the wind.
Because what would happen if folks discovered it was NSA's direct fault for the election getting rigged on both sides?
NSA has gone so far in their extremism that now they can't let anyone blame them for their actual fuck ups that endanger all of us.
The weirdest thing about Guccifer isn't what he did, nor how he did it, nor why, but that he's is still, today, tweeting in public, mocking NSA, which I know they know, and yet they do nothing.
I won't tell you who. If you're smart, you'll find him. He loves puzzles, and he's the best I've ever seen at it. Think of it as a meritocracy. If you're worthy, you'll figure it out on your own and join the club.
The real story behind Guccifer is why NSA covered up for Guccifer. I don't know if Guccifer the Shadowbroker is ex-NSA or even active NSA, but whoever he is, there is no way to separate what he did from what NSA did.
Think I'm larping?
Then why do I have screenshots of Podesta's Gmail password reset 3 months before it happened, and the Clinton Foundation's Exchange admin panel and the CMS for their backup vendor?
Everything Crowdstrike has said is laughably wrong. They're so shitty at cyber they deserve to get popped like Sony.
Maybe it already happened, who knows? ;) Crowdstrike won't exist in less than 2 years. You'll see.
Edit: I was downvoted for kindly asking for a source?