Last time I checked the DHS hasn't seen the server yet.
Because the signatures of 'Russian government malware' were found? Same signatures we recently found CIA can (and does) easily fake?
Was the initial report they retracted more or less definitive?
Remember the Iraq War was also started with lies corroborated by the US Gvt and the courts did not pose an obstacle to it...
I dont care if men eith epilletes tell me so. I want to see the proof.
At this point you're just trolling.
>The company removed language that said Ukraine's artillery lost 80 percent of the Soviet-era D-30 howitzers, which used aiming software that purportedly was hacked. Instead, the revised report cites figures of 15 to 20 percent losses in combat operations, attributing the figures to IISS.
There's no definitive proof, there's evidence. This is as definitive as it gets, we've got a report by some of the best people in the field that's also been corroborated by the US DHS.
I'm sure this is far better evidence than anything that exists to the contrary, people get convicted on shakier grounds every day.
It is not disputable that DNC servers were infected by Russian government malware.