You shouldn't imprison someone for incorrect political opinions and unsubstantiated gossip about non-criminal bad behaviour.

In any case, I think you're wrong that WikiLeaks doesn't publish information on certain countries [0]. And, I agree that they do have political opinions however it's impossible to avoid this: if you don't think something is political, it's because you share its politics.

[0] https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/5n58sm/i_am_julian_as...

> Look at how partisan WikiLeaks is - look at the countries that it doesn't publish information on, look at the candidates it doesn't try to discredit.

Before we get carried away by the attitude: "Johnny does it too...", why don't we focus on the information that has been published. The crimes that have been exposed by Wikileaks ? From a pragmatic point of view , it would be stupid of Wikileaks operatives or anyone in their position to antagonize all sides. Where would Snowden be today if he did not have the Russians to help save his life? In any case, as I have stated, focus on the crimes laid bare before us now. They can always leak more later.

>Listen to others who were a key part of Wikileaks talk about Assange's behaviour towards others, , look at the comments that his sexual behaviour was going to get him into trouble long before this case blew up.

His sexual behavior is irrelevant to the expose.

When wikileaks was launched, I thought that Assange was such an idiot that it would never get off the ground. How wrong I was.

Note that Wikileaks did try to redact the material they got. So eventhough they messed it up, they tried to do the right thing.

Wikileaks was supposed to be a platform for leakers. To get their material out. Wikileaks is not supposed to be balanced publication that tries to compile some sort of truth.

So in that sense, given the original goal of wikileaks, they just had to publish those documents during the US elections. It would be different if there was evidence that they got documents damaging to Trump and refused to publish them.

So, Assange is an idiot and best not invited to parties. Wikileaks is probably a bad idea. But none of that warrents a complete abuse of the legal system by Sweden. And also a complete violation of basic european human rights by the UK.

Do you have any proof that Wikileaks has any information on those countries or that they are conciensely withholding information? Have you ever considered that you might be partisan?

Who don't they publish information on? If you mean Russia they've published quite a bit.

I am aware of zero credible accusation that Wikileaks has suppressed publication of anything, ever. If you are and have any evidence of it, the front page of the new York Times is yours.