News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Noncompete Clauses: Signing Away the Right to Get a New Job by hammock on Saturday May 13, 2017 @04:14PM (#14332770)
>A company is paying me to work for them, they're not paying to own me. When I'm off the clock, my time is my own, up to and including doing paid work for anyone else I want.

Suboptimal if you're working for a direct competitor. Standard conflict of interest stuff. Would you accept Donald Trump working for Russia on the night shift?

Remember, non-compete is not the same as IP clause - which says anything you create on the job (and potentially off the job) is owned by the company.

Re:Noncompete Clauses: Signing Away the Right to Get a New Job by mikeash on Saturday May 13, 2017 @05:36PM (#14333148)
Donald Trump gets paid more than enough to be considered to be on the clock 24/7, and it's generally understood that this is the nature of that job.
Re:Noncompete Clauses: Signing Away the Right to Get a New Job by Cerium on Saturday May 13, 2017 @06:46PM (#14333391)
Well, as President Donald Trump gets paid a base salary of 400k. As another poster pointed out the difference between 40 hours / week, and 24/7 is 4.2x. That would mean that "more than enough" for a normal salary is $95k.
Re:Noncompete Clauses: Signing Away the Right to Get a New Job by Spooky23 on Sunday May 14, 2017 @12:24AM (#14334211)
Elected official's job status is defined by statute. Money is irrelevant.

This is often a matter of serious debate. For example, in New York legislators are considered part time, so they are permitted to operate businesses or be employed while in office. This creates an appearance (at a minimum) of conflict of interest in many scenarios. Full time employees of government generally need permission by the appointing authority to do meaningful outside business.

This applies to any government employee. A janitor on government payroll generally needs permission to work for a company that cleans offices at night.

Re:Noncompete Clauses: Signing Away the Right to Get a New Job by mikeash on Saturday May 13, 2017 @07:02PM (#14333432)
That was me. And $95,000/year is a pretty good salary. Don't forget the free room and board on top of that.
Re:Noncompete Clauses: Signing Away the Right to Get a New Job by coredog64 on Saturday May 13, 2017 @08:32PM (#14333664)
The government provides the cooks and household staff, but the president is responsible for paying for the food.
Re:Noncompete Clauses: Signing Away the Right to Get a New Job by saganus on Saturday May 13, 2017 @10:01PM (#14333861)
Really? Do you have a link for this?

This sounds very interesting and sort of funny. Not really sure how it works on other presidential houses, but still sounds amusing since it will probably require rules and guidelines on what exactly to deduct from the president's paycheck, no? What if the president invites someone over, in a sort-of-unofficial way but not really, do you get deducted as well? or maybe not because it was "for the job" sort of?

Definitely interested to know more.

Re:Noncompete Clauses: Signing Away the Right to Get a New Job by _n_b_ on Sunday May 14, 2017 @01:31AM (#14334373)
http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/10/politics/presidential-debt/

I read about this in a book called The Residence: Inside the Private World of the White House, which was decently interesting.

Re:Noncompete Clauses: Signing Away the Right to Get a New Job by saganus on Sunday May 14, 2017 @11:41AM (#14336031)
Thanks!

Like I said, it does sound reasonable but apparently it does add up. From the link:

"[Laura] Bush wrote that a bill came monthly, itemizing everything she and her family owed, including food, dry cleaning and hourly wages for waiters and cleanup crews at private parties."

"There were some costs that I was not prepared for," Bush wrote. "I was amazed by the sheer number of designer clothes that I was expected to buy, like the women before me, to meet the expectations for a first lady."

Re:Noncompete Clauses: Signing Away the Right to Get a New Job by forinti on Saturday May 13, 2017 @09:14PM (#14333761)
And the retirement plan: ex-presidents get the same salary as the current president. Not bad at all.
Re:Noncompete Clauses: Signing Away the Right to Get a New Job by kobeya on Saturday May 13, 2017 @10:17PM (#14333915)
Wow, is that true of vice presidents that become president for 3hrs when air force one goes offline in the middle of a national security crisis?
Re:Noncompete Clauses: Signing Away the Right to Get a New Job by hammock on Saturday May 13, 2017 @10:05PM (#14333873)
Not sure if it's relevant to the point, but Trump is donating his salary, Kennedy did as well, Hoover refused a salary and Washington tried to. I don't believe you can judge whether a job is 24/7 or not by the amount they pay you.