Re:110M-year-old dinosaur discovered with skin and soft tissue
by dang on Friday May 12, 2017 @04:39PM
(#14327721)
Please let's not bring religious arguments here. They're predictable, which makes them uninteresting, which makes them off topic.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:110M-year-old dinosaur discovered with skin and soft tissue
by NoCoastCoder on Friday May 12, 2017 @04:54PM
(#14327856)
I agree with the conclusion but that reasoning makes no sense.
Re:110M-year-old dinosaur discovered with skin and soft tissue
by Cerium on Friday May 12, 2017 @05:08PM
(#14327950)
From the guidelines: "On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting."
Re:110M-year-old dinosaur discovered with skin and soft tissue
by dang on Sunday May 14, 2017 @01:56PM
(#14336653)
It took me years to understand this dynamic, so of course I'd be interested in how the reasoning is wrong. But [email protected] would be a better place to communicate that at this point.
Btw, if you're going to tell someone this, you should say why. Otherwise they can't learn and the comment is uninformative.
Re:110M-year-old dinosaur discovered with skin and soft tissue
by ceejayoz on Friday May 12, 2017 @04:59PM
(#14327888)
Threads on Uber, Facebook, Apple, the NSA etc. are pretty predictable. Are we deeming them off-topic too?
Re:110M-year-old dinosaur discovered with skin and soft tissue
by dang on Friday May 12, 2017 @06:14PM
(#14328347)
"Pretty predictable" is already something different, and those topics have a steady influx of new information to mutate them at least somewhat.
The other factor, of course, is the heat with which these things burn. When they burn to a crisp, the crisps are all the same.