News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why functional programming matters by cholantesh on Tuesday April 18, 2017 @09:53AM (#14138780)
>Language research is still in the phase of bad humors and blood letting.

Love this. Practically all the claims I've seen are just small code samples accompanied by the author's vague endorsement.

Re:Why functional programming matters by goalieca on Tuesday April 18, 2017 @10:09AM (#14138918)
I've seen an number of papers focusing on the mathematical side of things. While I'm not a PL researcher, it does seem to me that math is the universal language and it seems reasonable to focus on that rather than non-sense concepts like objects.
Re:Why functional programming matters by cholantesh on Tuesday April 18, 2017 @01:52PM (#14141118)
How would we mathematically represent usability?
Re:Why functional programming matters by goalieca on Tuesday April 18, 2017 @03:20PM (#14142012)
By capturing relations. If we define an algebra it will have certain properties (eg commutative, associative). You don't think twice when writing a physics equation on how to factor, compose, or compute a value. It comes naturally from the rules of algebra.

In category theory we might have different categories. Some might instruct the compiler and programmers that the function obeys certain rules when applying. It could be trivial to parallel or perhaps it specifies a strict sequencing for computation. Following Haskell research, you can really see the evolution as people find more useful generalizations (which in the end, has made things simpler!)

Re:Why functional programming matters by jackmott on Tuesday April 18, 2017 @11:28AM (#14139627)
can you provide empirical evidence to support your theory?