Re:A Computer Scientist’s View of Life, the Universe, and Ev...
by tmsldd on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @04:03AM
(#14095695)
If you consider that our brain is a computer, then your argument isn't valid.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A Computer Scientist’s View of Life, the Universe, and Ev...
by goatlover on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @05:22AM
(#14096047)
Our brain isn't a computer. That's the most recent metaphor we've used to try and make sense of the three pound organ in our heads.
Re:A Computer Scientist’s View of Life, the Universe, and Ev...
by chriswarbo on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @08:26AM
(#14096929)
Our brain is a computer. That fact may or may not offer useful insights on the properties of brains that we care about.
Likewise, our brains are engines, converting energy from one form to another, and hence governed by thermodynamics. Again, that fact may or may not be useful for investigating properties of the brain we care about.
Our brains are also matter, meat, networks, made of atoms, and squishy. These are all facts, they may or may not be useful.
Re:A Computer Scientist’s View of Life, the Universe, and Ev...
by goatlover on Thursday April 13, 2017 @01:34PM
(#14109113)
Or our brain is a telegraph, the world wide web, an orchestra, a theater, a tv, millions of mindless bots, etc.
We use metaphors to help understand things we lack a literal explanation for, or the full explanation is complex and ongoing (neuroscience, biology, chemistry).
Re:A Computer Scientist’s View of Life, the Universe, and Ev...
by tmsldd on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @09:54AM
(#14097670)
Profound and inspiring!
Thanks for your input.
Re:A Computer Scientist’s View of Life, the Universe, and Ev...
by NikolaeVarius on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @06:55AM
(#14096469)
Computers were literally the name of people who number crunched for a living. Human brains are by definition the original computer
Re:A Computer Scientist’s View of Life, the Universe, and Ev...
by tmsldd on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @07:15AM
(#14096566)
Counter Argument:
Please answer the question: 1+1=?
Congratulations, you are a computer.
(And that's probably a very difficult question, considering you had to acquire the concept of symbolism, numbers and relationships)
Re:A Computer Scientist’s View of Life, the Universe, and Ev...
by ThomPete on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @06:09AM
(#14096239)
We are pattern recognizing feedback loops with memory. How is that not like a computer?
Re:A Computer Scientist’s View of Life, the Universe, and Ev...
by psyc on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @07:13AM
(#14096558)
Like is the operative word.
Re:A Computer Scientist’s View of Life, the Universe, and Ev...
by ThomPete on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @07:45AM
(#14096709)
Sure just as you are like me but different or i am like a monkey but different. We are all simulating a reality.
Re:A Computer Scientist’s View of Life, the Universe, and Ev...
by psyc on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @01:40PM
(#14099888)
I agree that computation is the best metaphor we have to date, for everything.
Re:A Computer Scientist’s View of Life, the Universe, and Ev...
by simonh on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @07:25AM
(#14096617)
We're special!
Re:A Computer Scientist’s View of Life, the Universe, and Ev...
by vecter on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @04:04AM
(#14095702)
Please expand
Re:A Computer Scientist’s View of Life, the Universe, and Ev...
by tmsldd on Wednesday April 12, 2017 @04:12AM
(#14095739)
See Marr's 3-levels hypothesis. If we "run" an algorithm able to find a program to compute arbitrary data, there must to exist that general algorithm. We (just) need to copy it and implement in silicon..