News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Can Wind Power Revive Jobs in America's Heartland? by salesguy222 on Sunday April 09, 2017 @08:08PM (#14075044)
Jobs involve physical risks and opportunity costs.

There are plenty of truly poor people out there who I really do think would rather be homeless than toil dangerously.

9.70 doesn't pay for a broken arm or back pain years down the line

Re:Can Wind Power Revive Jobs in America's Heartland? by tabeth on Sunday April 09, 2017 @08:30PM (#14075117)
Not every job that pays $9.70 is necessarily dangerous, so I fail to see your point. That article is more of a representation of a greater potential issue.
Re:Can Wind Power Revive Jobs in America's Heartland? by Dylan16807 on Sunday April 09, 2017 @09:26PM (#14075371)
> Not every job that pays $9.70 is necessarily dangerous

Right, hence the comment implying that a gas station job around that amount would get workers. But in a time where there is a significant push to make the minimum wage $15, it's not surprising that people won't do hard labor for $10.

Re:Can Wind Power Revive Jobs in America's Heartland? by tabeth on Sunday April 09, 2017 @11:01PM (#14075684)
Hard labor pays more than $10. You're missing the overall point, but OK. It still doesn't explain why foreigners take the jobs and not Americans.
Re:Can Wind Power Revive Jobs in America's Heartland? by nikdaheratik on Monday April 10, 2017 @12:41AM (#14076085)
Because the opportunity cost equation is different for them. $10/hr working hard labor vs. easy labor is the choice for American workers; $10/hr in the U.S. versus $4/hr elsewhere is the equation for the foreign workers. On top of that, they have the option of taking the $10/hr work for 4-6 months, and then travelling back to their home country where their cost of living is much lower and it works out the be the equivalent of $25-30/hr in purchasing power.
Re:Can Wind Power Revive Jobs in America's Heartland? by astrange on Monday April 10, 2017 @01:19AM (#14076244)
Maybe it'd help if the cost of living was lower here.