Re:Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber
by cyberferret on Sunday February 19, 2017 @05:03PM
(#13682303)
True, as much as I sometimes hate the extra 'red tape' that the Australian Government puts upon businesses here, they do offer a pretty fair level of protection against employers abusing or unfairly treating employees.
It is pretty hard for a business here to dismiss an employee without reasonable grounds that would stand up in court - which of course, if it got to that level, means that the whole story would have to come out, so a situation like the one in this thread would have meant Uber being in a world of hurt while all their dirty laundry was aired in a court.
Re:Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber
by holografix on Sunday February 19, 2017 @07:12PM
(#13683115)
As a fellow Australian I must add that in three separate occasions, at two distinct tech companies, I have seen people be terminated immediatelly following a complaint of this nature to HR.
These were men and women in high management positions and by immediately I mean within 48 hours or a fortnight or so in a bullying case.
Re:Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber
by pbiggar on Sunday February 19, 2017 @08:16PM
(#13683437)
Who was fired? The victim or the harasser?
Re:Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber
by holografix on Sunday February 19, 2017 @09:52PM
(#13683884)
The perpetrator was fired
Re:Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber
by revelation on Sunday February 19, 2017 @05:32PM
(#13682513)
You can't sue, there is likely a mandatory arbitration clause in the employment contract (because why not, it's free) and it applies to everything.
Re:Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber
by lg on Sunday February 19, 2017 @08:55PM
(#13683625)
you can't sue. but you can file charges with the EEOC, and if they want to they can sue on your behalf.
Re:Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber
by jannettee on Sunday February 19, 2017 @05:40PM
(#13682570)
Exactly, I saw this in my offer.
Re:Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber
by chii on Sunday February 19, 2017 @07:22PM
(#13683183)
arbitration clause should only apply in civil suits, iirc. I would hate to think that sexual harassment is a civil case, rather than criminal.
Re:Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber
by matt4077 on Sunday February 19, 2017 @08:48PM
(#13683592)
Sexual harassment is a civil case. Criminal law only gets involved if it's assault.
Re:Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber
by madeofpalk on Sunday February 19, 2017 @06:16PM
(#13682778)
Also not enforceable.
Re:Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber
by revelation on Sunday February 19, 2017 @06:22PM
(#13682813)
Well, I thought the same, then thought better of the kneejerk reaction and instead decided to learn something new today.
And Google tells me that yes, even in cases of rape, courts have found them enforceable.
Re:Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber
by mcherm on Sunday February 19, 2017 @06:52PM
(#13683014)
Why on earth do you think that? Mandatory binding arbitration clauses in employment contracts have been enforced before.
It seems insane to me that the only recourse you have after HR is basically "gather evidence and sue" which seems to be common advice in this thread.