Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by bitL on Sunday January 29, 2017 @06:24PM
(#13517454)
Can you make a paid version of Firefox (identical to the free one)? I'd buy if it were for $25, or even give you $50/year subscription to keep you afloat.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by c0nducktr on Sunday January 29, 2017 @06:40PM
(#13517541)
Someone on the Firefox subreddit mentioned that one of the ideas which is being considered is offering a privacy-centric VPN service for people who donate. I think that would be a great benefit for subscribers, and a neat way for Mozilla to set Firefox apart from other browsers.
Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by neon_electro on Sunday January 29, 2017 @07:42PM
(#13517801)
In the meantime, Cloak is doing a good job providing a paid product that meets this need: https://www.getcloak.com/
(I'm a satisfied customer)
Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by vopi181 on Sunday January 29, 2017 @09:34PM
(#13518250)
Why would you recommend a apple only service?
Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by ISL on Monday January 30, 2017 @12:31AM
(#13518927)
Because neon_electro is a satisfied customer?
Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by ddito on Monday January 30, 2017 @01:45AM
(#13519133)
Are you in some way affiliated maybe?
Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by auscompgeek on Sunday January 29, 2017 @06:29PM
(#13517483)
You can always donate at https://donate.mozilla.org/.
Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by bambax on Monday January 30, 2017 @12:33AM
(#13518932)
Donations don't replace paying options, that's a grave error. Companies can't "donate" (or it's super difficult) because their accountant will yell at them.
Offer something that can be bought and written down on a proforma.
Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by Esau on Sunday January 29, 2017 @07:00PM
(#13517634)
That's interesting because I've seen plenty of articles over the years stating that they get a ton of money via the search agreements - not to mention the people who donate code. Shouldn't they be self sustaining?
Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by bitL on Sunday January 29, 2017 @07:17PM
(#13517695)
Yahoo! is going belly up so not sure they can rely on search agreements for much longer. It's better if they have some direct small individual customers I think.
Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by twblalock on Sunday January 29, 2017 @08:26PM
(#13517985)
I'm pretty sure Mozilla has a clause in the contract with Yahoo that covers this: http://www.recode.net/2016/7/7/12116296/marissa-mayer-deal-m...
"According to the change-of-control term, 9.1 in the agreement, Mozilla has the right to leave the partnership if — under its sole discretion and in a certain time period — it did not deem the new partner acceptable. And if it did that, even if it struck another search deal, Yahoo is still obligated to pay out annual revenue guarantees of $375 million."
Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by ddito on Monday January 30, 2017 @01:48AM
(#13519141)
So if Mozilla goes to another search engine, Yahoo still needs to pay them for nothing? How did Yahoo agree to this?
Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by fapjacks on Monday January 30, 2017 @02:24AM
(#13519249)
That's Marissa Mayer for you. [0]
[0] http://www.recode.net/2016/7/7/12116296/marissa-mayer-deal-m...
Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by zbraniecki on Sunday January 29, 2017 @07:19PM
(#13517698)
How would you like Mozilla to be financed?
Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by Esau on Sunday January 29, 2017 @07:59PM
(#13517879)
My point is - I thought they were - by search engine agreements.
Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by cpeterso on Monday January 30, 2017 @12:32AM
(#13518930)
That's correct. When you say "self-sustaining", do you mean from direct user donations or paid services (like the built-in VPN example), instead of "selling eyeballs" to Google or Yahoo? There is discussion about creating a Mozilla membership program and what benefits could be offered.
Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by michaelmrose on Monday January 30, 2017 @02:00PM
(#13524007)
You realize they do have quite a bit of revenue via yahoo right?