Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by ddito on Monday January 30, 2017 @01:48AM
(#13519141)
So if Mozilla goes to another search engine, Yahoo still needs to pay them for nothing? How did Yahoo agree to this?
Re:Chrome Widevine DRM can no longer be disabled
by fapjacks on Monday January 30, 2017 @02:24AM
(#13519249)
That's Marissa Mayer for you. [0]
[0] http://www.recode.net/2016/7/7/12116296/marissa-mayer-deal-m...
"According to the change-of-control term, 9.1 in the agreement, Mozilla has the right to leave the partnership if — under its sole discretion and in a certain time period — it did not deem the new partner acceptable. And if it did that, even if it struck another search deal, Yahoo is still obligated to pay out annual revenue guarantees of $375 million."