If you would be a famous rockstar and women(or men) would be all over you, would taking advantage of it be a "nasty deed"?
That said, it does seem like Bill Clinton's actions were worse. He paid a ton of money to settle the Jones lawsuit, IIRC.
Equivocating what Trump bragged about with what Clinton was only accused of is a sad argument.
I doubt you have watched the Paula Jones interviews from when she was a young woman, since you don't believe that Clinton behaved shamefully in this instance when he was governor. Clinton was an effective president, but he apparently had his bad sides.
In no way way am I defending Trump, but I am willing to wait a few months to see if he can accomplish anything positive. Then, when I am totally disappointed I will probably get active politically again, probably supporting third party candidates after the DNC fiasco in the last election.
Thank the DNC political hacks for a Trump presidency.
In no way way am I defending Trump, but I am willing to wait a few months to see if he can accomplish anything positive.
Right now, the current president gleefully degrades people. Is that ok with you?
I agree - as long as being "toxic" means hurting the business. But as far as the "community" is concerned, it would be interesting to know what percentage of it might be, if not in favor of, but rather tolerant to Trump being president, regardless of whether he is seen as a "presidential material" (whatever that means) or not.
I think it's shameful to bring politics into tech, it also goes against all that inclusivity talks that people give. Are we going to only allow people into tech if they subscribe to a particular political belief?
> Everyone is entitled to their opinions. But when you openly support a candidate who likes to "grab [women] by the pussy"
It's called bragging, it's what people do, and they make stuff up along the way, here is an example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oVoJMVsKtk
If you convict every single man in the US who has made such a statement, you would not have many left.
> how will female and muslim applicants feel if they know part of their process might be controlled by someone who finds this acceptable?
How do you think female rape victims who have been raped by muslims feel about this? I also find it funny that you played the muslim and the female card in one paragraph, go on the internet and look up how women are being treated by most muslim countries.
Everyone is entitled to their opinions. But when you openly support a candidate who likes to "grab [women] by the pussy", and now is making headway into some sort of Muslim ban which was a campaign headline, how will female and muslim applicants feel if they know part of their process might be controlled by someone who finds this acceptable? Might it discourage them?