News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Time to Take a Stand by mark_l_watson on Saturday January 28, 2017 @03:24PM (#13508949)
I am a life time Democrat, but every time I hear someone bring up the poor taste pussy grabbing comments, I have to ask: do you give Bill Clinton a pass on what happened with Paula Jones? Listening to old interviews as a very young woman, Paula Jones paints an awful image of what Clinton did. There is plenty to criticize Trump for, but nasty comments are not as bad as nasty deeds.
Re:Time to Take a Stand by jannotti on Saturday January 28, 2017 @03:40PM (#13509075)
He was reporting a deed. You are accepting Paula Jones comments as fact of a deed, but you are not accepting Trump's own self-report of his behavior as a deed. Remember that the tape also contained him saying things like, "I can't resist beautiful, I just kiss", and "They let you get away with it". These are not abstract tasteless comments, like saying something tasteless about a woman's body. These are self-reported "nasty deeds".
Re:Time to Take a Stand by whitemale on Sunday February 05, 2017 @04:06PM (#13574647)
Trump was bragging, it's something men do under circumstances.

If you would be a famous rockstar and women(or men) would be all over you, would taking advantage of it be a "nasty deed"?

Re:Time to Take a Stand by mark_l_watson on Saturday January 28, 2017 @03:48PM (#13509174)
OK, fair enough about Trump. Easy for me to say since I don't like him and didn't vote for him.

That said, it does seem like Bill Clinton's actions were worse. He paid a ton of money to settle the Jones lawsuit, IIRC.

Re:Time to Take a Stand by CalChris on Saturday January 28, 2017 @04:02PM (#13509288)
Clinton paid $850,000 without admitting liability to make a lawsuit go away. Jones' lawsuit was bankrolled by Republicans.

Equivocating what Trump bragged about with what Clinton was only accused of is a sad argument.

Re:Time to Take a Stand by mark_l_watson on Saturday January 28, 2017 @05:29PM (#13509870)
So, $850K in today's money would be a couple of million? A lot to pay someone, but he got what he wanted in not having to admit liability.

I doubt you have watched the Paula Jones interviews from when she was a young woman, since you don't believe that Clinton behaved shamefully in this instance when he was governor. Clinton was an effective president, but he apparently had his bad sides.

In no way way am I defending Trump, but I am willing to wait a few months to see if he can accomplish anything positive. Then, when I am totally disappointed I will probably get active politically again, probably supporting third party candidates after the DNC fiasco in the last election.

Thank the DNC political hacks for a Trump presidency.

Re:Time to Take a Stand by CalChris on Saturday January 28, 2017 @05:57PM (#13510053)
You are aware this settlement was only after the court had dismissed the suit. This was just to get her to drop the appeal.

  In no way way am I defending Trump, but I am willing to wait a few months to see if he can accomplish anything positive.
Wow.
Re:Time to Take a Stand by mark_l_watson on Saturday January 28, 2017 @06:19PM (#13510211)
Why "Wow"? He has done one thing I like, dropping out of the "trade" deals TPP and TPIP. Who knows, he might actually do something else I like. Who knows.
Re:Time to Take a Stand by Retra on Saturday January 28, 2017 @04:02PM (#13509285)
Why does it even matter? Nobody is letting Bill Clinton run the country.
Re:Time to Take a Stand by mverwijs on Saturday January 28, 2017 @05:50PM (#13510013)
Let's discuss Bill Clinton when he becomes president again, ok?

Right now, the current president gleefully degrades people. Is that ok with you?