News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:American chestnut trees are “technically extinct” by CalRobert on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @06:29AM (#13480548)
'Perhaps, but in my view not compared to "They all disappeared," which suggests proactive agency (did they run away?) rather than passive fate'

Ah, I see your point. Sadly I think a generation or two of teachers maniacally chastising their students for ever using the passive form could have something to do with this.

Even in this forum, you'll find plenty of people saying that all writing need be direct, simple, and brief. There's virtue in that for quick memoranda, but to say that there's no place in the world for complex, abstract writing or the expression of nuance in careful word choice (as you describe) is a real shame. Too often I've been corrected by people who say "you mean 'I wish I _was_' because the subject is singular".

There's some evidence that language is what makes abstract thought even possible. Perhaps we're leaving our minds unable to comprehend abstractions when we reduce that available in our language. More discussion is at https://neuroanthropology.net/2010/07/21/life-without-langua....

Or maybe I just need to get over it. I overcame my violent aversion to starting sentences with "or" and "and", after all.

Re:American chestnut trees are “technically extinct” by coldpie on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @09:42AM (#13481680)
Just want to say that what I feared was going to be an angry grammar-nazi-stand-off was actually a pleasant, friendly, and informative discussion of the possibilities of language usage in different contexts. Cheers for keeping your heads, all.
Re:American chestnut trees are “technically extinct” by Ensorceled on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @10:04AM (#13481909)
I was thinking pretty much exactly the same thing, more "grammar gentlepeople" please!
Re:American chestnut trees are “technically extinct” by lutusp on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @12:38PM (#13483668)
> There's virtue in that for quick memoranda, but to say that there's no place in the world for complex, abstract writing or the expression of nuance in careful word choice (as you describe) is a real shame.

Yes, I agree. Einstein was supposed to have said something to the effect that if we can't explain something in a few words, then we don't really understand it. I think he said that before creating general relativity, which can't be explained in a few words. :)

> There's some evidence that language is what makes abstract thought even possible.

Yes, or in any case some abstract notation scheme, some organizing/categorizing symbol set. Like mathematics, which is more than its notation but that (for most people) can't be sustained without the notation.

Apropos, did you know pure math notation can support jokes? Here's my favorite:

8i = ∞

> I overcame my violent aversion to starting sentences with "or" and "and", after all.

In the 1970s I noticed Texas Instruments beginning certain advertising promotional sentences with "And." I saw it as a way to add emphasis to what might otherwise have been a series of short sentences; phrases partitioned with semicolons and other similar devices. So I started using it. And never gave it up. :)

By the way, I stole the earlier "writing/typing" meme from Truman Capote, who supposedly said it about some of his contemporaries whom he regarded as hacks.

Re:American chestnut trees are “technically extinct” by logfromblammo on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @06:35PM (#13487301)
> 8i = ∞

I'd say that's more a pun than a joke.

Re:American chestnut trees are “technically extinct” by wruza on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @08:01AM (#13481028)
>I overcame my violent aversion to starting sentences with "or" and "and", after all. This alone interested me in advanced English. Learning via reading all these comments and blog posts, I rarely realize that I'm learning from non-native speakers.
Re:American chestnut trees are “technically extinct” by CalRobert on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @08:15AM (#13481124)
Interestingly non-native speakers will sometimes have a better handle on usages which are declining in English-speaking countries. I understood when to use "whom" much better after studying Wer, Wen, and Wem in German.