News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Phone numbers are not proper verification by herbst on Monday January 16, 2017 @04:21AM (#13408988)
You can in most countries as far as i know. But in my example i quit my account (so made it prepaid essentially) and lost the SIM card, which means i lost my account forever. Now it waits for the simcard to invalidate and then will most likely sell the number again. It was a "easy number" (as in people remember that number after telling them once) so i assume it will be resold rather fast.

But just because you can does not mean people want that. Before it became normal to auth everywhere with phone numbers i happily changed my number yearly.

Re:Phone numbers are not proper verification by richthegeek on Monday January 16, 2017 @06:02AM (#13409330)
You'd be surprised. Number portability is a big pain in the arse for us (determining the network from an MSISDN is important in my industry) so it's always a nice bonus when we come across countries without it.

Most recently, Philippines: http://www.prefix.ph/smart-users/updated-philippine-mobile-p...

Re:Phone numbers are not proper verification by herbst on Monday January 16, 2017 @06:29AM (#13409412)
This is a really interesting example! Thank you, i obviously only thought about my rather small digitalnomad bubble & issues. But this is a good example for the same problem on a much bigger scale.

Once again it shows you cant just close your eyes and judge from yourself to others.

Re:Phone numbers are not proper verification by icebraining on Monday January 16, 2017 @04:53AM (#13409095)
You can change them, you just have to change them in those services too. Same as with email, or any other authentication mechanism, really.
Re:Phone numbers are not proper verification by erelde on Monday January 16, 2017 @04:34AM (#13409028)
Just to offer the other side of this, I, on the other hand, have the kept the same mobile phone number since the beginning.