Re:Phone numbers are not proper verification
by herbst on Monday January 16, 2017 @04:21AM
(#13408988)
You can in most countries as far as i know. But in my example i quit my account (so made it prepaid essentially) and lost the SIM card, which means i lost my account forever. Now it waits for the simcard to invalidate and then will most likely sell the number again. It was a "easy number" (as in people remember that number after telling them once) so i assume it will be resold rather fast.
But just because you can does not mean people want that. Before it became normal to auth everywhere with phone numbers i happily changed my number yearly.
Re:Phone numbers are not proper verification
by richthegeek on Monday January 16, 2017 @06:02AM
(#13409330)
You'd be surprised. Number portability is a big pain in the arse for us (determining the network from an MSISDN is important in my industry) so it's always a nice bonus when we come across countries without it.
Most recently, Philippines: http://www.prefix.ph/smart-users/updated-philippine-mobile-p...
Re:Phone numbers are not proper verification
by herbst on Monday January 16, 2017 @06:29AM
(#13409412)
This is a really interesting example! Thank you, i obviously only thought about my rather small digitalnomad bubble & issues. But this is a good example for the same problem on a much bigger scale.
Once again it shows you cant just close your eyes and judge from yourself to others.
Re:Phone numbers are not proper verification
by icebraining on Monday January 16, 2017 @04:53AM
(#13409095)
You can change them, you just have to change them in those services too. Same as with email, or any other authentication mechanism, really.
I don't know if that means a mobile network can take your number away, but just like managing the registrar on a domain, you can manage the portability of your number.
[1] https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-telecoms-and-internet/inform...