I think all 3 you mentioned are spending not insignificant resources in other programing languages.
IBM sees future in Swift LOB apps and Go on blockchain related efforts. Also with open sourcing of their own J9 components they would be even less inclined to participate in OpenJDK fork or some such
Redhat sees Ceylon on apps side and with all this containerization thing going on, may be quite a bit of Go.
Google of course is betting big on Dart on apps side and Go on infra side.
For Banks I do not see any issue at all to either pay Oracle or Azul to get commercially supported JDK. Their main unique requirements are either high-perf GC(Azul) or high perf collections which they anyway write for themselves.
Red Hat still has a lot of money invested in the JVM ecosystem, see all the JBoss products. Ceylon also targets the JVM, so even if not Java The Language we will see Red Hat continue to support Java The Platform for a long time.
Indeed. And that will be excellent reason not to go on warpath with Oracle when so many of Red Hat customers look to run Oracle certified Java and other Oracle Enterprise products on Red hat systems.
Re:OpenJDK now available for Windows
by paulddraper on Thursday December 22, 2016 @10:49PM
(#13242693)
> Google of course is betting big on Dart on apps side
Dart is dead (or at least dormant). Google is pushing MS'ss Typescript very hard with Angular 2.
They will be employed to work on the JDK: there are plenty of companies that are already involved in Java and employ people to work on it outside of Oracle.
Hypothetically IBM, Red Hat, Google and the other non-Hotspot VM makers could band together and fork Java successfully - hell, a even a bank or 3 will want in on the action. They will have to name it something else and prepare for the inevitable epic lawsuit, but funding people to work in the JDK will nor be a problem.