Re:Beware of Developers Who Do Negative Work
by firebones on Monday December 19, 2016 @12:58AM
(#13209727)
On the surface, I think you're describing fire-fighters (who are loved for solving high-visibility problems), but in retrospect, I think these are also developers with very high reading comprehension and reasoning abilities. That may not make them great designers and architects (though some are), but they can see code for what it is and fix it, as in "The Big Lebowski", "in the parlance of our times" (in other words, in a way that fits the code as it was originally written).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Beware of Developers Who Do Negative Work
by Aeolun on Monday December 19, 2016 @01:20AM
(#13209790)
I mean, if you understand spaghetti code just as easily as any other code, why wouldn't you write it? It would make no difference to them.
Re:Beware of Developers Who Do Negative Work
by MAGZine on Monday December 19, 2016 @03:00AM
(#13210154)
What is this reasoning?
If you know the right way and wrong way to build a bridge, you'd build it wrong, because it makes no difference?
Re:Beware of Developers Who Do Negative Work
by falsedan on Monday December 19, 2016 @03:31AM
(#13210238)
More like, if you know English and Latin, why not blog in Latin, since it makes no difference to your ability to enjoy your posts.
Re:Beware of Developers Who Do Negative Work
by user5994461 on Monday December 19, 2016 @09:56AM
(#13211748)
So, the question that makes the difference should whether he writes blog for himself or for his readers?
[replace "blog" by "code"]
Re:Beware of Developers Who Do Negative Work
by falsedan on Monday December 19, 2016 @11:21AM
(#13212396)
Anyone can read their blog! Since anyone can learn Latin, if they feel like it.
(Yes, I know I'm representing a terrible argument.)
Re:Beware of Developers Who Do Negative Work
by flukus on Monday December 19, 2016 @04:05AM
(#13210343)
It's a lack of reasoning, if it's not causing any issue's why change? The rest of us write good code because we're to dumb to read bad code.
Re:Beware of Developers Who Do Negative Work
by guitarbill on Monday December 19, 2016 @05:29AM
(#13210593)
No, the reasoning is why build it to handle 600% specified load (and higher cost) if 150% specified load is sufficient?
(Not that there aren't good reasons to do this. Especially for public infrastructure which might be around for a shockingly large time. But predicting future usage is very difficult. For a small start-up, it's fair to err on the side of leaner/fix-it later IMO)