News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Beware of Developers Who Do Negative Work by MAGZine on Monday December 19, 2016 @03:00AM (#13210154)
What is this reasoning?

If you know the right way and wrong way to build a bridge, you'd build it wrong, because it makes no difference?

Re:Beware of Developers Who Do Negative Work by falsedan on Monday December 19, 2016 @03:31AM (#13210238)
More like, if you know English and Latin, why not blog in Latin, since it makes no difference to your ability to enjoy your posts.
Re:Beware of Developers Who Do Negative Work by user5994461 on Monday December 19, 2016 @09:56AM (#13211748)
So, the question that makes the difference should whether he writes blog for himself or for his readers?

[replace "blog" by "code"]

Re:Beware of Developers Who Do Negative Work by falsedan on Monday December 19, 2016 @11:21AM (#13212396)
Anyone can read their blog! Since anyone can learn Latin, if they feel like it.

(Yes, I know I'm representing a terrible argument.)

Re:Beware of Developers Who Do Negative Work by flukus on Monday December 19, 2016 @04:05AM (#13210343)
It's a lack of reasoning, if it's not causing any issue's why change? The rest of us write good code because we're to dumb to read bad code.
Re:Beware of Developers Who Do Negative Work by guitarbill on Monday December 19, 2016 @05:29AM (#13210593)
No, the reasoning is why build it to handle 600% specified load (and higher cost) if 150% specified load is sufficient?

(Not that there aren't good reasons to do this. Especially for public infrastructure which might be around for a shockingly large time. But predicting future usage is very difficult. For a small start-up, it's fair to err on the side of leaner/fix-it later IMO)

Re:Beware of Developers Who Do Negative Work by di4na on Monday December 19, 2016 @03:29AM (#13210233)
The other way around. If you can get out with doing it the wrong way, why even care about there being a good way ?