Re:Beware of Developers Who Do Negative Work
by guitarbill on Monday December 19, 2016 @05:29AM
(#13210593)
No, the reasoning is why build it to handle 600% specified load (and higher cost) if 150% specified load is sufficient?
(Not that there aren't good reasons to do this. Especially for public infrastructure which might be around for a shockingly large time. But predicting future usage is very difficult. For a small start-up, it's fair to err on the side of leaner/fix-it later IMO)
(Not that there aren't good reasons to do this. Especially for public infrastructure which might be around for a shockingly large time. But predicting future usage is very difficult. For a small start-up, it's fair to err on the side of leaner/fix-it later IMO)