Re:German judges explain their decision that ad-blocking sof...
by mehdix on Sunday December 11, 2016 @08:17AM
(#13150932)
I'm interested in eventual Google's reaction to ad-blocking software. Will they try to weld ads to web technologies or they'll accept the current situation?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:German judges explain their decision that ad-blocking sof...
by matheusmoreira on Sunday December 11, 2016 @11:04AM
(#13151594)
Google's reaction is to try and make better ads so that people won't want to block them. A 2016 interview¹ with Google's Senior VP-Ads reveals their focus is on a better ad experience; figuring out what's OK and what's not and respecting that.
¹ http://adage.com/article/digital/google-s-ad-boss-ad-blockin...
Re:German judges explain their decision that ad-blocking sof...
by AlexandrB on Sunday December 11, 2016 @11:43AM
(#13151821)
> Will they try to weld ads to web technologies...
Yes, it's called AMP.
Re:German judges explain their decision that ad-blocking sof...
by Kenji on Sunday December 11, 2016 @08:29AM
(#13150967)
I guess they'll just raise inconvenience to block the ads higher and higher, just like they did on Android phones, where Chrome did not have any extensions and apps serve ads that cannot be blocked without you getting root access to your phone (which is another inconvenience) and editing your hosts file or something like that.
Re:German judges explain their decision that ad-blocking sof...
by micheljones on Sunday December 11, 2016 @09:12AM
(#13151135)
The primary motivation for rooting the phone in order to be able to modify the hosts file was to block ads in ad-supported free apps. Another low-tech method for achieving this was to put the phone into airplane mode while using the apps.
When it comes to the browser itself, another common method for adblocking was for the adblocker to function as a proxy server that you'd setup in chrome, and you didn't need root for this.
Also, you can just use Firefox for android, which lets you install same extensions as on the PC version, including adblockers.
Re:German judges explain their decision that ad-blocking sof...
by userbinator on Sunday December 11, 2016 @09:42AM
(#13151245)
This is where MITM can be very useful. You can still configure the DNS server to one you control, and which blocks the domains you don't want. I believe you can still install your own certificates and MITM the rest of the traffic too, filtering it through a proxy like Privoxy or Proxomitron. The availability of VPN means you don't need to be at home to have a filtered connection, but you do need another machine running the endpoint+proxy.
Re:German judges explain their decision that ad-blocking sof...
by denim_chicken on Sunday December 11, 2016 @09:51AM
(#13151274)
That's why you should be using Firefox.
Re:German judges explain their decision that ad-blocking sof...
by zant95 on Sunday December 11, 2016 @08:58AM
(#13151080)
Blocking ads is the only reason that makes me depend on root. I built a script[1] that generates flashable zip and from time to time I update it on my phone.
Re:German judges explain their decision that ad-blocking sof...
by chei0iaV on Sunday December 11, 2016 @10:50AM
(#13151525)
If you weren't aware, if you have root there's AdAway:
https://f-droid.org/repository/browse/?fdfilter=adaway&fdid=...