Please. This is hyperbole of the first order.

http://www.transparency.org/country#GBR

http://www.transparency.org/country#RUS

"Corruption perception index"

That's the problem. Corruption in the UK isn't perceived as such, because they go to greater lengths to hide it. That doesn't change the fact that UK politics are rotten to the core and their politics have a much bigger global effect. Remember when London bankers recently manipulated the stock market and got away with it?

And let's not ignore that Transparency International themselves are somewhat shady. They gave Hillary Clinton an award for integrity and that's only the funniest of their failings.

The fact that people feel compelled to go to greater lengths to hide it is itself a net positive, no? The higher the costs of doing X, the less X there will be.

>The higher the costs of doing X, the less X there will be.

That's a very simplistic and primitive way to look at it. For one, there are more and wealthier people involved so the costs are shared. Profits are also bigger, because the UK is better connected, so the increased investment costs are acceptable.

My first thought is of the repeated derailing of the investigation into the political class paedophile investigation.

I am glad to see this rise in people who are actively realizing that BBC News is State Media. The government are using the grey vote to take away wiggle room that they don't understand and know that younger generations don't want. The BBC and News Papers play a strong role in where the country goes right now. It makes me sick and deeply irritated so I try not to think about that too much.

If its any consolidation the same is true of the US. I'd wager if you looked deep enough the same entities that have corrupted the UK also corrupted the US and Russia.