European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption of Data

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by kenoph on Sunday November 27, 2016 @12:52PM (#13050337)

Killer use of Caps Lock and broken English. Proud of my country. On a serious note, I really do hope that we won't follow USA steps this time. But I'm afraid that the average person doesn't really care for or understand cryptography. Maybe a dickpic approach à la John Oliver could be useful as a way to raise awareness on the matter.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by strictnein on Sunday November 27, 2016 @01:19PM (#13050474)

> " I really do hope that we won't follow USA steps this time."

In what way, exactly? Europe is farther down this path than the US is currently.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by kenoph on Sunday November 27, 2016 @01:29PM (#13050536)

Is it? NIST has been putting backdoors in recommended encryption standards. USA State Department also classifies strong cryptography as a munition. As far as I know we don't do similar things in Europe (yet?), but I could be wrong.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by strictnein on Sunday November 27, 2016 @03:15PM (#13051234)

Europe has dual-use tech export controls - http://www.wassenaar.org/

They're as meaningless as the American versions, only randomly ensnaring companies that sell to a doubleplus ungood entity. They don't do anything to stem the flow of crypto information or open source software to all parts of the globe.

And that NIST thing happened possibly once. It's not a common ongoing occurrence.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by caf on Sunday November 27, 2016 @07:23PM (#13052537)

You quote that like Wassenaar is somehow a different thing to the US restrictions, but the US is a member of Wassenaar and ITAR is the USs implementation of it.

(So yes, to the broader point that all the Wassenaar countries implement very similar restrictions).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by strictnein on Sunday November 27, 2016 @07:36PM (#13052595)

I was responding to the poster who wasn't sure if Europe had similar restrictions. Each country implements those agreements in unique ways, so my point was that everyone's implementation was basically pointless.

And, of course, the US's treatment of cryptography as munitions predates Wassenaar (the PGP case was previous to it, for instance), not sure about how everyone in Europe handled it prior to the agreement.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by kenoph on Sunday November 27, 2016 @06:06PM (#13052167)

DES is also believed to contain a backdoor. And even if it only happened once, I still don't see how "Europe is farther down this path than the US is currently".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by strictnein on Sunday November 27, 2016 @07:19PM (#13052512)

So England is going to just have all this fun by itself?

http://www.theverge.com/2016/11/23/13718768/uk-surveillance-...

They've actually had a law requiring you to decrypt on demand since 2007:

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2007/10/uk-can-now-demand...

Nothing like that in the US at all. So, further down the path. France and Germany want similar laws.

http://www.reuters.com/article/europe-attacks-france-germany...

And other countries are joining in the call:

https://www.geektime.com/2016/11/26/5-eu-states-demand-bette...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by kenoph on Sunday November 27, 2016 @08:07PM (#13052727)

Thanks for the pointers. I knew about the UK but I believe it is an exception in Europe rather than the rule, as of now. Of course I agree with you that probably most countries will try to get there, unfortunately. Then again, I can only read stuff written in my own language or English so I don't have the full view.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by caf on Sunday November 27, 2016 @07:25PM (#13052548)

DES isn't widely believed to contain a backdoor. There were (a long time ago) questions about the changes the NSA made to the S-boxes, but it has since become apparent that these changes actually strengthened the cipher against differential cryptanalysis.

DES was weakened in a much more prosaic manner: the effective key size was reduced to 56 bits.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by ferongr on Sunday November 27, 2016 @01:02PM (#13050391)

When don't need inflammatory personas like John Oliver in Europe.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by musha68k on Sunday November 27, 2016 @01:09PM (#13050425)

What can a "hacker" possibly have against John Oliver? He and his team were the most effective drivers for stronger Net Neutrality policies in the US.

The man is a living legend.

Edit: 12 million views on the abstract topic of Net Neutrality.

That's what I would call a feat indeed:

https://youtu.be/fpbOEoRrHyU

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by kenoph on Sunday November 27, 2016 @01:14PM (#13050446)

Well I'm sure some people lost the respect for the guy after he jumped on the "vote for Hillary" bandwagon. But yeah, things like the Snowden interview, Net Neutrality and some other episodes are simply brilliant.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by spdy on Sunday November 27, 2016 @01:24PM (#13050503)

And he was right there is no 3rd option in the US election system.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by musha68k on Sunday November 27, 2016 @02:24PM (#13050875)

Exactly, time to move on now that fake choice #2 won the election.

Almost comical how easily and predictably we stay on track in terms of bread and circuses politics/media - almost comical - if it weren't all real and there wouldn't be far reaching and dire consequences.

Let's not get played but stick together FFS.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by popey456963 on Sunday November 27, 2016 @01:23PM (#13050495)

I realise Hillary might not be a pillar of excellence in her personal electrical security, but at least she isn't trying to disband Net Neutrality like Trump currently seems to be. He's changing policies that will affect things for years to come.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by rconti on Sunday November 27, 2016 @01:46PM (#13050626)

Just because you agree with a person doesn't mean you need to agree with their methods.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by zombees on Sunday November 27, 2016 @01:05PM (#13050403)

Would you care to elaborate? He's from Europe.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by dom0 on Sunday November 27, 2016 @01:13PM (#13050441)

Yeah but now he isn't (in Europe) ;)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:European Union dedicated questionnaire on the Encryption ... by vuanotinv on Sunday November 27, 2016 @01:22PM (#13050493)

And I'm sure many people would be happy if he moved to Israel. ;^}

[ Parent | on HN ]