News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by emiliobumachar on Monday November 14, 2016 @07:09AM (#12949266)
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by fivre on Monday November 14, 2016 @12:25PM (#12951447)
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by kafkaesq on Monday November 14, 2016 @05:07PM (#12953796)
now that Denmark was suddenly part of the Reich

Actually, rather than being annexed into the Reich itself, Denmark was made into a protectorate (so the government and king were left in place -- but instrumented to serve the Reich's purposes). Similar to the status of the Netherlands and Norway.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by Demcox on Monday November 14, 2016 @06:56AM (#12949215)
I did not know this, so I guess it can qualify as news for me lol
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by cyphar on Monday November 14, 2016 @07:13AM (#12949287)
Congratulations, you're one of the lucky 10,000 today! https://xkcd.com/1053/
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by bdcravens on Monday November 14, 2016 @01:00PM (#12951776)
I've read it before, still more enjoyable to read than someone's blog about the new MBP.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by DennisP on Monday November 14, 2016 @06:55PM (#12954442)
I thought I knew the story, but I didn't know that lives were at stake.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by mikebay on Monday November 14, 2016 @01:29PM (#12952029)
It's sad that Obama have one for peace also. Wrong man & wrong agenda from day one.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by nilved on Monday November 14, 2016 @02:09PM (#12952380)
Yes, that really tarnished the entire thing for a lot of people.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by GFK_of_xmaspast on Monday November 14, 2016 @09:30PM (#12955154)
It's a minor blemish compared to Henry Kissinger winning one.
[dead]
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by sctb on Monday November 14, 2016 @10:57AM (#12950603)
We've banned this account for trolling.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by EvilTerran on Monday November 14, 2016 @07:31AM (#12949372)
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

"On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity."

"Please don't submit comments complaining that a submission is inappropriate for the site."

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by Coding_Cat on Monday November 14, 2016 @06:16AM (#12949009)
So you would have been fine if this article was posted here on the day it was written instead? That's a bit arbitrary because the story itself is much older than five years and wouldn't have been "news" than either.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by adtac on Monday November 14, 2016 @06:41AM (#12949130)
Did you know about this before this was posted today?

Even if you did, I'm sure several others got to know of this just today - which makes it worthwhile IMO.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by dekhn on Monday November 14, 2016 @08:21AM (#12949636)
yes this story is highly documented in histories of nuclear physics.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by mavhc on Monday November 14, 2016 @06:56AM (#12949218)
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by zorked on Monday November 14, 2016 @08:32AM (#12949696)
And this is how incredibly smart people can over-engineer a solution to a simple problem...
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by philipkglass on Monday November 14, 2016 @05:02PM (#12953770)
I'm going to guess that it looks over-engineered to you because you haven't been a chemist. This is the chemist equivalent of solving a problem with a 10 line Ruby script: perhaps more complicated than the very simplest conceivable solution, definitely a terrible path to solution if you were suggesting it to a lay third party, but not very complicated at all for someone who has spent a lot of time in the lab. It looks a lot more complicated to someone working outside the domain than someone working inside of it.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by Practicality on Monday November 14, 2016 @09:15AM (#12949893)
What is the simple, appropriately engineered solution?
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by macspoofing on Monday November 14, 2016 @09:27AM (#12949958)
Take a boat out and toss the medals into the sea?
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by tim333 on Monday November 14, 2016 @10:33AM (#12950391)
Wouldn't have been able to get the gold back that way.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by macspoofing on Monday November 14, 2016 @12:03PM (#12951241)
I'm going to have to push back on this clear scope creep.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by edblarney on Monday November 14, 2016 @09:26AM (#12949950)
"What is the simple, appropriately engineered solution?"

To hide them.

The Germans are not going to spend a division of soldiers 4 years to dig up all of Copenhagen.

There are innumerable places to hide them.

They also could have simply been deformed i.e. markings removed, then they're just clumps of gold and evidence of nothing.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by mikeash on Monday November 14, 2016 @12:05PM (#12951258)
This takes the tech community's propensity for Monday-morning quarterbacking to a breathtaking new level. Yes, I'm sure you came up with a much better solution in your sixty seconds of thinking in your comfortable chair than the people on the spot, faced with literal Nazis, did at the time.

Just hide them! I wonder why Nobel laureate Niels Bohr and future Nobel laureate George de Hevesy didn't think of that.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by edblarney on Monday November 14, 2016 @01:40PM (#12952134)
"Just hide them! I wonder why Nobel laureate Niels Bohr and future Nobel laureate George de Hevesy didn't think of that."

Because they are geniuses and probably over-think everything.

It would take 20 minutes to find a spot to hide them, and they wouldn't be recovered for 1000 years if people weren't the wiser. But it would be pointless because you can remove the markings with any hard objects, basically instantly.

The Nazis were not 'hunting' for this stuff, even if they were, it wouldn't be worth any effort.

Step 1) take a hammer to them and remove the markings. Gold is soft and malleable. Evidence = gone. 5 minutes.

If you're worried about having arbitrary bits of unmarked gold:

+ Throw it in the garbage next door + Throw it in a bag in the harbour + Bury them in the lane or garden around the corner + Throw it in the sewer

It's just a couple of small bits of unmarked gold at that point. Wherever it's found - or not - it's meaningless.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by pmoriarty on Monday November 14, 2016 @08:06PM (#12954807)
"Because they are geniuses and probably over-think everything."

There are some anecdotes to the contrary.

Enrico Fermi famously estimated the strength of the first atomic bomb by "dropping from about six feet small pieces of paper before, during and after the passage of the blast wave."

Richard Feynman tested the integrity of an o-ring which he concluded must have caused the Challenger disaster by dropping the o-ring in to a glass of cold water and noticing its deformation.

These are but the first two examples that spring to mind of simple solutions found by "geniuses". I'd also categorize the way the gold medals were hidden as another simple (and brilliant) solution. It would be interesting to read a compilation of such anecdotes, if one exists.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by jandrese on Monday November 14, 2016 @09:38AM (#12950017)
Um, they were stealing everything not nailed down.

Your response reads like "now it's just worthless gold!"

Yes, they probably could have buried it in the woods somewhere, but that wouldn't have made for the cool story to tell the grandkids.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by tim333 on Monday November 14, 2016 @10:36AM (#12950412)
>"I suggested that we should bury the medal(s)," but Bohr thought no, the Germans would dig up the grounds, the garden, search everywhere in the building. Too dangerous.

Though I guess they could have found somewhere else...

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by endisukaj on Monday November 14, 2016 @12:57PM (#12951743)
I took that to mean that there was not much time as Nazis were patrolling the streets, going out with two large gold medals would be extremely dangerous as they might have been stopped and searched.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by theandrewbailey on Monday November 14, 2016 @11:32AM (#12950911)
> To hide them.

That's kind of what was done. It was a clever simple hack. I'm not sure how hard it is to prepare aqua regia (maybe they had a sufficient quantity already), but all they had to do was drop the metals in, wait, and place on a shelf with other innocuous flasks and solutions.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by nerdponx on Monday November 14, 2016 @03:10PM (#12952851)
The article so specifically stated that he was concerned the Germans would dig up the place. Also consider that there might be others interested in a large gold disk
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by edblarney on Monday November 14, 2016 @03:56PM (#12953282)
"The article so specifically stated that he was concerned the Germans would dig up the place"

The Nazis would surely dig up his offices, but not Copenhagen.

Moreover, the Nazis didn't even know that those things were there - and they don't really have much value at all to the Nazis. They're a couple of pieces of gold.

The Nazis could do whatever they pleased with whomever they wanted - it's ridiculous to think that a couple of tiny pieces of gold would have changed their view on what to do with an acclaimed scientist. It's laughable.

They'll capture a Scientist and put him to work on whatever they want, or not.

A couple of pieces of gold are totally irrelevant.

If this were a bottle of 'heavy water' or some nuclear material, or piece of gear that they knew existed, knew was in his possession and had some strategic value, then they might spend some time looking for it. Otherwise this is not a story.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by pmoriarty on Monday November 14, 2016 @08:25PM (#12954875)
"it's ridiculous to think that a couple of tiny pieces of gold would have changed their view on what to do with an acclaimed scientist. It's laughable."

Many people were killed on a whim by the Nazis, without much if any reason at all. Being a famous scientist wouldn't necessarily save you (and especially not your valuables, which were frequently confiscated).

Then there's a good chance that the grunts who searched these people wouldn't know who they were, wouldn't care, or even feel contempt or hatred for them because of who they were or what they said or did, and would in fact value gold far more than their lives.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by edblarney on Monday November 14, 2016 @10:38PM (#12955414)
That's why hammering out the Nobel details and throwing them in the garbage, harbour, garden would have saved them entirely.

Random gold found in the harbour does not implicate Bohr.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by BurningFrog on Monday November 14, 2016 @01:28PM (#12952025)
If you're Bohr, you have to assume that the Nazi army will impose a shoot-on-sight curfew when they reach your part of Copenhagen in a few hours or less.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by varjag on Monday November 14, 2016 @10:08AM (#12950204)
Turing did that with his silver, look how that worked for him. And there weren't even Nazis around!
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by justin66 on Monday November 14, 2016 @02:53PM (#12952678)
The nice thing about this hidden in plain sight solution is that the location of the medals could be communicated among a small community of colleagues if necessary without the need for a messy paper trail. A set of coordinates or a treasure map is a lot less reliable in that it can be lost or intercepted.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by Angostura on Monday November 14, 2016 @05:53PM (#12954107)
The solution only has three ingredients - it's quite an elegant solution really
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by lordnacho on Monday November 14, 2016 @07:53AM (#12949461)
I find it a little bit hard to believe that finding a couple of medals would be a priority as you're invading Denmark and Norway.

Sure, the Danes basically lay down and let the Germans march in, but really? The Germans needed to get to Norway asap, and were probably more concerned about that. Secure airfields, harbors, that kind of thing.

More likely the Danish cooperation policy helped later on, after the Germans had established themselves. Basically, the Danish government decided to save everyone a lot of trouble by cooperating with the invaders, a policy that is much discussed in Danish politics. It came to an end in 1943 after the Germans had done a number of hard to tolerate things.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by greenshackle2 on Monday November 14, 2016 @11:18AM (#12950758)
They weren't looking for the medals specifically, they were looking for evidence of wrongdoing. If you're going to search for evidence, you're going to do it at least semi-thoroughly , cause you don't expect that sort of thing to just be sitting on a workbench (though you probably wouldn't go as far as digging holes in the backyard, unless you have specific reasons to think evidence was literally buried).
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by maxerickson on Monday November 14, 2016 @09:21AM (#12949925)
So the thing to do then is to track down the source quoted in the article When the Nazis ransacked Bohr's institute and figure out if it is exaggerated.

Your mere disbelief is rather weak in the face of statements like that one.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by lordnacho on Monday November 14, 2016 @09:47AM (#12950068)
Flipping through the book, it doesn't give much detail as to when exactly the German stormtroopers came knocking.

The notes and errata at the end of the book don't seem to specify it either.

The point is the article makes it look like "oh crap the nazis have invaded, let's dissolve these medals" rather than "they been here for a few weeks and look like they're about to settle some bits of nazi business".

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by maxerickson on Monday November 14, 2016 @10:11AM (#12950221)
His autobiography is not detailed:

https://archive.org/stream/adventuresinradi01heve#page/27/mo...

I imagine they were thinking about hiding them pretty soon after the city fell though. I agree that overdramatizing the timing is unfortunate.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by edblarney on Monday November 14, 2016 @09:24AM (#12949940)
There are many places they could have been hidden and never found.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by kbart on Monday November 14, 2016 @09:56AM (#12950141)
Agree. While it's a cool story to tell your grandchildren, burying medals (of course, not on your own property) would be much faster solution.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by Practicality on Monday November 14, 2016 @03:36PM (#12953099)
Is there some method of digging holes that I am not aware of that doesn't make it obvious there is a freshly dug hole?

I mean, that spot in your neighbors yard that looks freshly dug would probably be a good place to look. (They were occupying the whole country)

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by crpatino on Monday November 14, 2016 @07:13PM (#12954536)
If you want a digging to go unnoticed, you don't try to conceal the digging; you dig in a place where lots of other mundane diggings are already happening.

So, not going out in the middle of the night in ninja swit; but chearful gardening in the Church's front yard instead.

You can even put a heavy, thorny bush on top, so people will be too lazy to undig it by accident.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by crpatino on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @12:21PM (#12969162)
I had missed the point about Nazis already going parading on the street. In that case, indoors methods of dealing with the medals provide a big advantage.

I'd probably have tried to melt them, though.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by harveywi on Monday November 14, 2016 @10:36AM (#12950417)
I believe a there is a plot line in Pulp Fiction that touches on a solution satisfying both constraints.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by pavel_lishin on Monday November 14, 2016 @11:46AM (#12951051)
The Nobel Prize medal appears to be about 2.5 inches wide, which would make it immensely unsatisfying in at least one constraint.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by nilved on Monday November 14, 2016 @02:10PM (#12952393)
You'd need to start with smaller medal first.
Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by edblarney on Monday November 14, 2016 @11:06AM (#12950663)
If he had hidden it, and it was never recovered, then it would be like a really cool 'Copenhagen mystery' - the 'lost Nobel Prize'.

They could have a little festival every year to look for it ...

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by erelde on Monday November 14, 2016 @08:31AM (#12949692)
I like how the author of this piece talk about Sir Martyn Poliakoff.

But the article predates his knighthood. (and presumably youtube fame)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martyn_Poliakoff

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by dr_zoidberg on Monday November 14, 2016 @11:39AM (#12950978)
Actually, the piece barely mentions Poliakoff, and not even by name:

> As you can see in this video from the University of Nottingham, dissolving gold is a slow business. The narrator (who looks like he was cast by Mel Brooks, but is presumably, the real deal) explains that nitric acid loosens the gold atoms, after which hydrochloric acid moves in, using its chloride ions to surround and transform the gold.

I really don't see where you read that he's been knighted, other than Wikipedia. From the videos YouTube page I didn't get his name either, and there are no comments in the article.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by erelde on Monday November 14, 2016 @01:19PM (#12951942)
That I was able to know his name without even knowing what was the video (I was behind a firewall which blocked youtube) should tell you that he has become pretty famous in the "internet famous" sense. The description was a giveaway and I remembered the video in question.

There's absolutely no need to be condescending... That description (which you quoted) was genuinely funny to me because I know who he is.

Re:Dissolve My Nobel Prize, Fast (2011) by dr_zoidberg on Monday November 14, 2016 @06:37PM (#12954336)
I wasn't being condescending, but you said:

> I like how the author of this piece talk about Sir Martyn Poliakoff.

> But the article predates his knighthood. (and presumably youtube fame)

And there were no mentions to Sir Poliakoff around, neither in the article nor the video. Still, it was interesting reading about him, and he surely has become an internet celebrity, but that doesn't change that your comment was out of place to begin with.