News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by lacampbell on Sunday November 13, 2016 @04:37PM (#12945817)
Right, I read that as your SO dictating to you that you must give her a diamond. My apologies.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by tukelully on Sunday November 13, 2016 @06:27PM (#12946406)
I think you were in the right and didn't really assume as much as suggested. I got the same impression particularly because of the language chosen. "non-negotiable" implies that there was a second party to necessitate negotiation. Saying "no alternative" would come closer to describing a personal taste threshold.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by ejcx on Sunday November 13, 2016 @07:21PM (#12946632)
Non-negotiable was a bad choice of words. It's been very negotiable. She just really didn't want cubic because of the perception, like someone else had noted.

It's just a little ridiculous to read 3 sentences a stranger types and tells them they are going to get a divorce. Bad form as far as unsolicited advice goes.

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by mythrwy on Sunday November 13, 2016 @08:03PM (#12946760)
I think he was trying to help (even if misguided) and besides he apologized. You could be gracious about it.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by nikatwork on Sunday November 13, 2016 @09:23PM (#12947093)
Hey mythrwy are you pregnant, you're looking a lot bigger? And also you should dump your partner because they conform to mainstream social standards, total red flag. Oh and you're raising your kids wrong.

Hey why are you offended? I was trying to help! You could be gracious about it.

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by mythrwy on Sunday November 13, 2016 @11:11PM (#12947502)
Are you teaching me a lesson? Or trolling? Real question. Because your approach isn't very constructive.

The guy apologized and maybe he thought his advice was good. I admit though it was blunt and the part about divorce was rude.

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by lacampbell on Monday November 14, 2016 @12:09AM (#12947689)
Ok, at this point I have to comment.

For one thing, I never said he would get divorced. I said "if you get divorced".

For another thing, if you are going to divulge details of your personal relationship online, you should not be surprised or get upset if someone comments about it. If it's a sensitive issue for you - keep it to yourself. This isn't your journal.

I take my apology back. I did absolutely nothing wrong, and people seriously need to develop thicker skin.

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by throwaway-hn123 on Monday November 14, 2016 @08:47AM (#12949763)
> people seriously need to develop thicker skin.

You should heed your own words...

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by PhasmaFelis on Sunday November 13, 2016 @08:12PM (#12946795)
I still read it that way. It seemed odd to me, too. I don't think you did anything wrong.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by j45 on Monday November 14, 2016 @12:06AM (#12947683)
I think it would be helpful if people who are giving their thoughts on a diamond can state if they've been married/engaged before.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by uremog on Monday November 14, 2016 @07:13PM (#12954539)
I don't think this is about expecting a diamond. More likely that it's about the abrupt mention of divorce.