News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by usaphp on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @03:25AM (#12907757)
> "life-threatening condition which my US insurance would never have covered"

I wonder how is that possible? Insurance plans these days have to cover you even if you have a pre-existing condition, even the cheapest plans cover everything after a deductible, unless I am missing something

Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by r00fus on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @04:11AM (#12908341)
Thank Obamacare for that, and that only kicked in on 2011. Prior to that, insurance recission was a real and pervasive issue for those with preexisting conditions.
Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by noir_lord on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @07:56AM (#12909868)
You have to wonder how long 'Obamacare' is going to last now with a Republican president, congress and senate...
Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by privong on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @08:30AM (#12910069)
> You have to wonder how long 'Obamacare' is going to last now with a Republican president, congress and senate...

I don't think the Republicans have enough people in the Senate to block filibusters. So I assume the Democrats will use the filibuster to block repeals of the healthcare law.

Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by dangoor on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @09:26AM (#12910482)
NYTimes has an article describing how they can effectively dismantle large portions of Obamacare:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/upshot/the-future-of-obama...

Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by r00fus on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @01:42PM (#12913262)
Why in the world would the GOP ever leave the filibuster in place? Mitch will remove it at the beginning of the 115th Congress.

Boom. Now Obamacare can be repealed with simple majority. I bet you dollars to donuts that insurance prices, however, will not go back down to pre-Obamacare prices. Because profits.

Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by drakonandor on Thursday November 10, 2016 @11:35AM (#12921873)
The fact that prices went up at all shows there is a huge problem. We're already paying more than anyone else in the world, why can't we get something for our money instead of having to pay even more?
Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by noir_lord on Friday November 11, 2016 @07:13AM (#12929932)
Because politicians don't represent you, they represent the people paying their bills.

Sounds simplistic but if you look at the system as a whole, ask who its benefitting the most, doesnt seem to be the electorate.

We have the same problem in the UK, it got us Brexit and you folks Trump.

As Michael Moore said when he predicted a trump win, "It's the biggest fuck you they can send".

Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by gambiting on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @09:22AM (#12910447)
To give you an example - my dad had to take 2 boxes of Glivec per month to keep him alive(he was predicted to survive 3-6 months, thanks to Glivec he lived another 8 years). Glivec, last time I checked, is currently 12 thousand dollars a box in US. And sure, most health insurance in US would cover most of that. But if you have to take two $12k boxes per month, and insurer says they will cover $10k per box, you suddenly have to find $4k per month just to buy your life saving medicine. In effect sure, you have insurance, but unless you are rich, you are fucked. The whole idea of deductible on health insurance is pretty much a US-only invention, and it literally kills people who are in theory "covered".
Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by Cerium on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @11:09AM (#12911256)
As a fairly young US citizen I'm curious, I thought that most health care plans have an out of pocket maximum that is usually in the low to mid thousands per year. Would this situation not be one that limits the yearly cost that way?
Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by arcticbull on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @11:37AM (#12911663)
US median individual wage is $39K/yr for males and $26.5K/yr for females [1]. That amounts to an after-total-tax (for a California resident) of $28K/yr for males and $19K/yr for females.

Average rent ranges from $500-$3600/mth though for illustrative purposes (taking into account people in expensive places share) let's use $1K/mth for our hypothetical person. [3]

That leaves you with $16K/yr (male) and $7K/yr (female) for food, transportation and incidental expenses.

Obamacare backed health plans have a maximum out-of-pocket of $7K/yr for individuals.

Yeah, I'd say the median American is pretty much SOL if they get sick even if they have insurance. And those figures don't take into account the price of the insurance itself if your employer elects not to provide it to you.

In the UK your NHS annual out-of-pocket maximum is $0.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_income_in_the_United_...

[2] https://smartasset.com/taxes/california-tax-calculator

[3] http://mentalfloss.com/article/81296/average-cost-one-bedroo...

[4] https://www.healthcare.gov/glossary/out-of-pocket-maximum-li...

Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by dragonwriter on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @03:02PM (#12914071)
> website crashes on election n...

US median individual wage is $39K/yr for males and $26.5K/yr for females [1]. That amounts to an after-total-tax (for a California resident) of $28K/yr for males and $19K/yr for females.

The tax calculator you reference includes estimates of sales, property, and fuel taxes (which make up much of the tax total at the incomes here), which are actually rolled into rent, transportation, and general purchases, so you are double counting some expenses.

Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by arcticbull on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @06:02PM (#12915715)
Ah good catch. Probably still not wildly off for illustrative purposes.
Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by usaphp on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @02:54PM (#12913991)
But with such a low income you will receive either a Medi-Cal which is almost free or a substantial government subsidy to pay for your health plan.
Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by brianwawok on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @03:30PM (#12914308)
Yes under 40k or so income insurance is free with no copay. Varies state by state etc.
Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by ceejayoz on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @11:42AM (#12911733)
Obamacare required all plans to have an out-of-pocket maximum. That may well go away now.
Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by mattkrause on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @05:13PM (#12915243)
I think the ACA also introduced the out-of-pocket limits.
Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by hiram112 on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @07:03PM (#12916249)
No the older plans mostly had out-of-pocket limits, too.

At least the standard employment sponsored plans.

Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by mattkrause on Thursday November 10, 2016 @08:57AM (#12920355)
Hmmm...perhaps the ACA changed the limits or something.

I thought my first (awful) plan had a benefit limit, as in you're getting a maximum of $1.25M from us, regardless of what happens.

Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by ceejayoz on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @11:41AM (#12911720)
Obamacare added three provisions in particular that affected my family. Annual and lifetime caps on coverage were banned, dropping sick policyholders was banned, and all plans were required to set maximum out-of-pocket costs.

My family has easily hit the pre-Obamacare lifetime coverage limits and fairly frequently would've hit the annual ones. Our $4k out-of-pocket cap saves us from 10-50k in coinsurance/copays depending on the year. As a result, they'd drop us in a heartbeat if they could.

Soon, it looks like they'll be able to.

Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by usaphp on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @02:54PM (#12914000)
> "Soon, it looks like they'll be able to."

Based on what? You are just speculating now

Re:Canada's immigration website crashes on election night by ceejayoz on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @06:22PM (#12915892)
Based on Republican control of House, Senate, and White House, their having explicitly stated they'd repeal Obamacare, and the ability to do a lot of damage to the law without risking a filibuster (which they can do away with entirely, incidentally). http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/upshot/the-future-of-obama...