News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Twitter Must Be Saved by vvanders on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @05:43PM (#12904623)
It's not just wide public discussion, when there's some large local event(weather, tornado, etc) I usually find the most up to date and accurate information on twitter 2-3 hours before any news site.

It's the CB radio of social media and I find huge value in that.

Re:Why Twitter Must Be Saved by niftich on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @06:48PM (#12905032)
> It's the CB radio of social media

Amazing analogy, far better than any other metaphor I've previously heard applied to Twitter

Re:Why Twitter Must Be Saved by Senji on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @12:49PM (#12912623)
4chan/8chan. If there's a "HAPPENING", it will be posted there faster than the news stations can keep up.
Re:Why Twitter Must Be Saved by komali2 on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @06:19PM (#12904860)
Does it function better for you than a google search or a news.google.com search?
Re:Why Twitter Must Be Saved by vvanders on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @06:23PM (#12904884)
Yes, much better. All it takes is someone and their phone.

Take for instance the recent tornado we had off the Oregon coast. I had video/pictures/reports showing up even ahead of the local NOAA site or google news.

Re:Why Twitter Must Be Saved by wingerlang on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @11:45PM (#12906105)
Similar, there was a fire around my office a week ago and within minutes there were an image on twitter. Within 30 minutes multiple ones from various angles.

Granted, it was the first time I ever went to Twitter for something like this, but I knew that it was /the/ place for the most up to date information.

And I try to avoid Twitter as much as possible, too annoying to read in there.

Re:Why Twitter Must Be Saved by athenot on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @10:59PM (#12905941)
Severe weather (tornadoes) is also the most important benefit I get from Twitter.

Generally speaking, it's great for aggregating witness accounts of a real-time event that's going on.

Re:Why Twitter Must Be Saved by snewk on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @06:37PM (#12904970)
how is news.google "social media" in any way?
Re:Why Twitter Must Be Saved by criddell on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @09:39AM (#12910568)
It isn't.

The person you replied to was responding to the idea that Twitter is a good source of news.

Re:Why Twitter Must Be Saved by gaius on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @02:30AM (#12907137)
It's the CB radio of social media and I find huge value in that.

We had that. It's called Usenet and IRC.

Re:Why Twitter Must Be Saved by yoz-y on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @06:02AM (#12909177)
If be "we" you mean a few highly invested tech people.
Re:Why Twitter Must Be Saved by gaius on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @10:26AM (#12910872)
Only to the same extent that CB was the exclusive preserve of truckers.

Look up "eternal September" if you want to understand the demographic of Usenet...

Re:Why Twitter Must Be Saved by yoz-y on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @12:07PM (#12912065)
I know about the Eternal September, but I believe that the AOL users that "swarmed" the network were more technically apt than the generic Twitter user and also were way fewer.

The skill (and motivation) gap between using something like IRC and Twitter is massive.

Re:Why Twitter Must Be Saved by mrweasel on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @07:23AM (#12909664)
I don't know anyone besides "highly invested tech (and media) people" that uses Twitter, so...

Usenet, IRC, Twitter, neither is really important for anyone besides are rather limited subsection of the general population.

Re:Why Twitter Must Be Saved by criddell on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @09:43AM (#12910599)
When CNN puts up a lower third scroll of Twitter commentary, do you think all those people are tech enthusiasts and media wonks?

You might not know people personally, but certainly you're aware of Twitter's role in the Arab Spring. And you've heard of Black Twitter, right?

Re:Why Twitter Must Be Saved by rahoulb on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @08:26AM (#12910056)
For some meaning of "limited subsection of the general population".

I had 12000 followers for a twitter account about a specific football club - a specific subsection but not a technical or media one.

I used to randomly look at my followers and while many were "highly invested tech and media people" - the majority were just people who wanted to stay up to date (in particular I used to live-tweet during games which lots of people really enjoyed).

That was a few years ago though - personally I rarely use Twitter any more.

Re:Why Twitter Must Be Saved by zimpenfish on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @07:35AM (#12909740)
Most of the people I follow aren't "highly invested tech (and media) people", just normal people who happen to use Twitter to connect with others.