Re:Why 2016 is such a terrible year for the Mac
by shermablanca on Saturday November 05, 2016 @04:41PM
(#12881774)
I'll be building a Hackintosh with 64 gb or ram and the latest processors and ssd. There is a strong community for that now and it's apparently more robust than it used to be. Here's a good article by one developer on his experience: https://medium.com/swlh/building-my-1-200-hackintosh-49a1a18...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why 2016 is such a terrible year for the Mac
by whywhywhywhy on Saturday November 05, 2016 @04:42PM
(#12881783)
> My audio doesn’t work
From the article.
Not sure why people still pass this around as if it's positive.
Re:Why 2016 is such a terrible year for the Mac
by jacquesc on Saturday November 05, 2016 @06:03PM
(#12882157)
To be clear, his audio jack doesn't work. He gets audio via USB. So no less broken than an iPhone 7.
Re:Why 2016 is such a terrible year for the Mac
by TulliusCicero on Saturday November 05, 2016 @08:40PM
(#12882761)
I approve of this burn.
Re:Why 2016 is such a terrible year for the Mac
by izacus on Saturday November 05, 2016 @05:32PM
(#12882003)
> Not sure why people still pass this around as if it's positive.
Well, there IS a site out there that lists 100% compatible hardware which includes (yes!) working Audio and other hardware.
Re:Why 2016 is such a terrible year for the Mac
by yardie on Saturday November 05, 2016 @04:50PM
(#12881825)
It's unavoidable. Most PC motherboards everything is swappable to the Mac equivalent. You can change the wifi daughter card for a compatible model. You can change the video card for a compatible model. You can't change the built in audio chip that's on the motherboard. But you can alleviate it with a superior USB DAC
Re:Why 2016 is such a terrible year for the Mac
by sctblol on Saturday November 05, 2016 @04:44PM
(#12881796)
It probably can be patched with this: https://github.com/toleda/audio_CloverALC
You can also use a USB headset as I do.
Re:Why 2016 is such a terrible year for the Mac
by johncolanduoni on Saturday November 05, 2016 @09:15PM
(#12882891)
Given the state of macOS virtualization with KVM, and how easy it is to find processors/motherboards with VT-d, I don't understand why people bother trying to get it to run on bare metal. Instead of having to choose almost every component super carefully, you just need to be careful about your graphics card and linux support for everything else.
The main strike against it I can think of is the performance hit for nested virtualization if you want to use something like Parallels or Docker inside macOS, but you can virtualize "sideways" without too much more effort in a lot of cases.
Re:Why 2016 is such a terrible year for the Mac
by bshimmin on Saturday November 05, 2016 @06:58PM
(#12882371)
Man, 64GB of RAM For $229. I remember buying 8MB for more than that...
Re:Why 2016 is such a terrible year for the Mac
by unclenoriega on Saturday November 05, 2016 @10:57PM
(#12883218)
64G ought to be enough for anybody.