News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter Shares Slump After Report Says Google Won’t Make ... by Lxr on Thursday October 06, 2016 @05:31AM (#12651197)
So if I pay $13 a year to use Facebook they'll no longer need to collect my data for advertising?
Re:Twitter Shares Slump After Report Says Google Won’t Make ... by dragonwriter on Thursday October 06, 2016 @09:46AM (#12652376)
If setting up and maintaining both as supported and fee-based infrastructure had no costs to Facebook and didn't hurt their advertising revenue per ad-supported user, sure, that would be the case.

In the real world, first, setting up and maintaining such a system would have substantial initial and operating costs (and possibly engagement costs, as it would complicate the UX), and, as opt-outs feom advertising would tend to be weighted toward the wealthier, more valuable (to advertisers), users, it would drop per advertising revenue per remaining advertising-supported user. So the buyout cost would have to be substantially more to break even.

Re:Twitter Shares Slump After Report Says Google Won’t Make ... by mtmail on Thursday October 06, 2016 @06:59AM (#12651449)
I doubt it. You're paying cable television and still see ads. They'll always be companies willing to give Twitter money to be able to advertise to them.
Re:Twitter Shares Slump After Report Says Google Won’t Make ... by jmngomes on Thursday October 06, 2016 @10:02AM (#12652496)
But how much would cable cost if the individual channels didn't rely on advertising for profit?
Re:Twitter Shares Slump After Report Says Google Won’t Make ... by sjg007 on Thursday October 06, 2016 @03:03PM (#12655129)
They'll never do this.. it is way more profitable to keep your value opaque. The average user might be worth $13 but not you!