News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google backtracks on privacy promise with messaging servi... by jjcm on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @09:11PM (#12553588)
Maybe I'm biased because I've done some intelligent agent work when I was back at Microsoft, but I really like how Allo handled this. They let the user decide whether or not they want convenience, or strict privacy. This is how it should be - up to the user.

Some people want the convenience of having their messages be stored in the cloud and helper bots to add relevant content to the mix, some people want a reduced experience but with the reward of privacy.

Re:Google backtracks on privacy promise with messaging servi... by heheocoenev on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @09:46PM (#12553729)
Disagree. The average user is not savvy enough to make this call. Secure end-to-end so I can have secure conversations with less technical people, and know we are both safe. It only take one party to escrow the logs to the server and all those conversations are no longer private. E2E||GTFO
Re:Google backtracks on privacy promise with messaging servi... by ak4g on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @09:56PM (#12553765)
Uh, no. Data loss for your end-users as a default behavior is unforgivable. The impetus is on people who think it's OK to irretrievably lose access to their freaking data when their phone battery explodes to set that up. For myself, and for Joe P. Random, losing my data without my having explicitly (and again) decided to take that risk is what directly precedes a decision to no longer use any Google products, full stop.
Re:Google backtracks on privacy promise with messaging servi... by pdkl95 on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @10:23PM (#12553884)
People already assume their voice conversations are (usually) ephemeral. As long as it is explained properly, an ephemeral text chat can not only be acceptable, it may also be a feature.

More importantly, why are you pretending that end-to-end encryption implies an irretrievable loss of data? If desired, backups can be made locally or to another local device such some type of LAN-only network storage or a USB storage device.

Re:Google backtracks on privacy promise with messaging servi... by r00fus on Thursday September 22, 2016 @04:05AM (#12555296)
Exactly. Snapchat = ephemeral video sharing/chat. Why is it so big?
Re:Google backtracks on privacy promise with messaging servi... by matt_wulfeck on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @09:56PM (#12553768)
Exactly, and this is precisely why it's E2E by default with iMessage. One company makes money off of your information, the other makes money off your hardware.
Re:Google backtracks on privacy promise with messaging servi... by brainfire on Thursday September 22, 2016 @08:25AM (#12556292)
That is how Allo works.
Re:Google backtracks on privacy promise with messaging servi... by sigmar on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @09:54PM (#12553759)
I'm big into privacy and that actually makes some sense to me. Though I'm a little concerned that if E2E isn't the default, it will be buried in the settings and most users won't ever think to use it.
Re:Google backtracks on privacy promise with messaging servi... by codedokode on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @09:55PM (#12553762)
> helper bots to add relevant content to the mix,

Is not that called an advertisement?

Re:Google backtracks on privacy promise with messaging servi... by sigmar on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @09:59PM (#12553785)
Have you used bots in Allo or telegram or facebook messenger or discord or slack? They can be very helpful.
Re:Google backtracks on privacy promise with messaging servi... by falcolas on Wednesday September 21, 2016 @10:14PM (#12553836)
I've often found the contrary - they add a lot of noise into the signal. For example, the gify bot encourages people to post response gifs to response gifs, creating pages of nothing but pure crap, making content harder to find than the proverbial needle in a haystack.

I don't need web pages expanded in-place, it pushes content off screen. I don't want CI/Jira/Pagerduty spam constantly dinging for my attention. I don't want random gifs. I don't want YouTube videos expanded and started automatically.

Maybe there's a good bot out there, but I haven't seen one yet.