Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack
by sidlls on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @01:57PM
(#12445541)
Actually I would find a desktop client more appealing. I'm not a fan of browsers-as-poorly-functioning-userlands-on-userlands that seems to be the modern fad.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack
by pavel_lishin on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @02:00PM
(#12445566)
But Slack's desktop client is excellent. Furthermore, Ryver makes a big point about guest access - and a browser client would be much better for guests than a dedicated client they may only use once.
Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack
by eli on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @02:04PM
(#12445598)
HipChat has both: a web client and a native windows/mac client.
Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack
by Bartweiss on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @02:15PM
(#12445686)
Slack also - you can use it in browser. Most people don't want to, but I've seen some people say that they do so much work there that it's nice to have a browser tab visible.
Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack
by pavel_lishin on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @02:09PM
(#12445639)
And per-channel guest access, too.
Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack
by patsullivan on Thursday September 08, 2016 @11:07PM
(#12459410)
We run in every browser and also have native apps for every platform.
Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack
by eli on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @02:00PM
(#12445570)
Yeah, not having a desktop client was one of the reasons we went with Hipchat over Slack. I can understand not everyone wants to use a native app, but it sure would be a nice option.
Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack
by Kadin on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @03:23PM
(#12446423)
> Yeah, not having a desktop client was one of the reasons we went with Hipchat over Slack.
Is Slack's desktop client a new thing? I'm relatively new to it, but they certainly have one now.
Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack
by jaegerpicker on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @05:26PM
(#12447879)
Slack has a native desktop client and has for a long time.
Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack
by daxorid on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @03:22PM
(#12446402)
Or, better yet, irssi in persistent tmux. Slack really can't compare to terminal irc clients in terms of usability and flexibility.
Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack
by patsullivan on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @03:26PM
(#12446474)
We run in every browser very well. Have a Mac, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android client.
Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack
by p4wnc6 on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @02:01PM
(#12445573)
Agreed. Desktop apps are generally so much better.
Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack
by patsullivan on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @03:27PM
(#12446493)
Most of our users do use the native apps. Some prefer the browser though.