Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack

Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack by pavel_lishin on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @02:00PM (#12445566)

But Slack's desktop client is excellent. Furthermore, Ryver makes a big point about guest access - and a browser client would be much better for guests than a dedicated client they may only use once.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack by eli on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @02:04PM (#12445598)

HipChat has both: a web client and a native windows/mac client.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack by Bartweiss on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @02:15PM (#12445686)

Slack also - you can use it in browser. Most people don't want to, but I've seen some people say that they do so much work there that it's nice to have a browser tab visible.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack by pavel_lishin on Wednesday September 07, 2016 @02:09PM (#12445639)

And per-channel guest access, too.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ryver: Why we run negative ads against Slack by patsullivan on Thursday September 08, 2016 @11:07PM (#12459410)

We run in every browser and also have native apps for every platform.

[ Parent | on HN ]