(I get the occasional feedback that people wish that the book was longer, they want more topics, but never any individual chapter being longer...)
But I think there's a silver lining to the length being so hard to see. I suspect it will lead to more authors tailoring their book length to how best to express the content rather than to the market expectations of the physical size of a "book".
Focusing on the ebook version first helps you keep the content to the right (best-fitting) length.
https://www.amazon.com/Math-Better-Explained-Unlock-Intuitio...
Check out a few articles on https://betterexplained.com/cheatsheet and see if they fit your style.
Go buy this guy's book :)
'The Pleasures of Counting' is one of the best math books you can get your hands on.
I get the marketing/value angle but it prevents lot of good material that would otherwise be written or written well.
This results in them rather taking a 300 page book vs 100 page book because they sell the 300 page book for more than the 100 page book and thus make more profit.
I personally have a friend who has authored many big name publisher books and he is always telling me how many words he has to have done by X date. The emphasis is on how many words, like 60,000 words.
Even though he can write a book that says the same shit in 20,000 words, the book publishers don't want this, because they won't make as much money.
That really sucks for the tech industry, maybe for fiction it is fine, since people just want more time outside reality anyways, but when you are trying to gain knowledge, a 300 page book is not usually as good as a 100 page book.
:sigh: