News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by barmstrong on Sunday March 21, 2010 @07:19PM (#1208824)
Key difference: "the user drops a coin into the slot".

Twitter missed that part :)

Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by aw3c2 on Monday March 22, 2010 @03:49AM (#1209734)
It would have miserably failed if they did not "miss" that part.
Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by Anon84 on Sunday March 21, 2010 @06:53PM (#1208776)
They even had a business model from day one! (it was coin based)
Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by frederickcook on Sunday March 21, 2010 @11:04PM (#1209172)
It even has location-based technology: it lets you know when your friends are near!
Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by Luc on Monday March 22, 2010 @05:22AM (#1209839)
Here's another view of it: http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/3359446/Hulton-Archive

The Popular Mechanix article says the message will stay in view 'at least two hours', while the Getty Images caption says 'up to two hours'. By the looks of it the latter seems more likely - pump enough coins into the machine and you can make earlier messages roll out of view!

Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by archgoon on Sunday March 21, 2010 @07:34PM (#1208845)
This is a message to location service. There is no broadcasting to all Notificators in London simultaneously, and each requires a coin for each message sent. The message is only up for two hours, and is not tied to a user. The intended purpose was for a specific person to be present at the destination.

How is this analogous to twitter any more than say, the classifieds of a newspaper?

Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by drgath on Sunday March 21, 2010 @08:31PM (#1208936)
You are totally right. Also, here you are writing on a piece of paper instead of typing in a text box. The viewing interface is also totally different as one is a either a monitor or a mobile device, and another is a crude bulletin board thing. And don't even get me started on ...

Lighten up!

:)

Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by archgoon on Monday March 22, 2010 @10:29PM (#1212009)
The interface hardly matters. I apologize for thinking about this too hard.
Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by Roridge on Monday March 22, 2010 @07:10AM (#1210005)
I love the way the post on the blog is under the category "Useless Tech".

I wonder if there was a patent for the machine.

Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by swombat on Sunday March 21, 2010 @06:49PM (#1208764)
No wonder Twitter is so popular in London. We've been tweeting since 1935!
Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by wallflower on Sunday March 21, 2010 @07:01PM (#1208796)
London was also known for its pneumatic tubes. Though not as extensive as Paris, there were many messages carried via pneumatic tube transport.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pneumatic_tube

Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by madssj on Monday March 22, 2010 @04:24AM (#1209771)
Until this day, I've always thought London was a cold, gray and boring place.

I stand corrected.

Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by wyclif on Sunday March 21, 2010 @10:34PM (#1209131)
The Internet is also known for its series of tubes.
Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by drgath on Monday March 22, 2010 @01:00AM (#1209430)
Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by eam on Sunday March 21, 2010 @06:13PM (#1208714)
Hmm... I wonder if it had a 140 character limit.
Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by njn on Sunday March 21, 2010 @07:03PM (#1208800)
writes a brief message on a continuous strip of paper

Sounds like maybe they were handwritten?

Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by roundsquare on Monday March 22, 2010 @09:26AM (#1210222)
Very cool. I wonder how widely used it was.
Re:"Twitter" in 1935 by chanux on Sunday March 21, 2010 @09:46PM (#1209056)
Wonder what this does http://www.notificator.com

PS: It's does Twitter searches.