But seriously, if we have too much people to work why not make scientists from all of them?
1. Change education system with the assumption that the default career is experimental science.
2. Change the workflow so that you don't need to be incredibly smart to prove you can be allowed to measure stuff and write the results down.
3. pay all these people to do science instead if of paying them the guaranteed income.
If we have to waste money at least "waste" them on something useful. Imagine the progress we could make if 50% of population worked as scientists. Imagine how different a society would look.
The problem would be real if society was mostly people that can't have any positive impact on science, but I don't think it's true, especially if we trained everybody with the listed assumptions.
Irrelevant. Which kind of "positive impact on science" would you expect from somebody with an IQ of 100 in the real world, as opposed to your hypothetical "society made up of Einsteins"?
Assign same experiments to 10 different teams all over the world to be sure. Would be actually better than unmotivated incredibly bright people hastily doing these experiments once.
Yes the way we do science would need to change but I think it's for the better. It's not like most of the work post-docs do isn't menial.
At lower real hourly wages. Which is the effect of automation competing with human labor, it doesn't outright destroy jobs, it just reduces the market-clearing price of the forms of labor it is able to compete with.