News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by wyager on Wednesday June 01, 2016 @08:29AM (#11813809)
What a foolish analogy. The Mafia uses violence to force people to "agree" to things. If one "can't say no" to a contract because their pre-contract situation sucks and will be improved by adopting the contract, they have suffered no violence.
Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by lisper on Wednesday June 01, 2016 @09:57AM (#11814351)
What difference does it make if the threat is actual violence or leaving you without an income so you end up on the street? What matters is not the particulars of the unpleasantness that awaits you if you don't accept the mafia's/corporation's offer, but the fact that the unpleasantness is a consequence of a situation that the mafia/corporation have themselves created.
Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by pif on Wednesday June 01, 2016 @12:27PM (#11815745)
> ... the unpleasantness is a consequence of a situation that the mafia/corporation have themselves created.

I don't understand how the corporation can be guilty. If someone offers you a job with a wage that you find modest, how is it his fault if nobody else is making you a better offer?

Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by lisper on Wednesday June 01, 2016 @12:33PM (#11815795)
There are a lot of things that companies do to make sure no one makes you a better offer. Here is just one recent example from the tech industry:

http://venturebeat.com/2014/05/23/4-tech-companies-are-payin...

Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by paulddraper on Wednesday June 01, 2016 @01:16PM (#11816202)
It's foolish, but that's not even the biggest reason.

It's foolish because he wants to replace one corrupt group of people that take your money and distribute it (the Mafia) with another corrupt group of people that take your money and distribute it (the government).