News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla... by nly on Sunday May 29, 2016 @05:55AM (#11795763)
The problems you list (if they even are problems) are nothing to do with robotics. They're AI problems. And that's AI in the sci-fi novel sense, not the oh so hip "let's build a cluster of 10000 GPUs running a convolution network to recognise cat pictures" sense.
Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla... by cm2187 on Sunday May 29, 2016 @06:00AM (#11795772)
But most of robotics is about AI. The electric and hydraulic aspects are old technologies.
Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla... by programmer_dude on Sunday May 29, 2016 @06:27AM (#11795827)
I think the battery problem still remains unsolved, other than that yes it's old technology.
Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla... by cm2187 on Sunday May 29, 2016 @06:32AM (#11795847)
I am not sure batteries would be a problem for a household robot. There are power sockets everywhere. And the robot can take a break from most tasks to charge itself (and like a dog it would spend most of the day sleeping anyway!).
Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla... by usrusr on Sunday May 29, 2016 @07:05AM (#11795925)
An advanced household robot would not even have to take charging breaks because it would be well up to the task of plugging itself in wherever it would work (except for the dog walking part, obviously)

In a similar line of thinking, I am actually kind of surprised that there are no wired quadrocopter swarms yet, that would form a bucket line of short cables to trade range for the power and infinite endurance of a grid connection. I am quite sure that there must be applications where this deal would be worthwhile.

Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla... by _up on Sunday May 29, 2016 @09:35AM (#11796303)
The idea of Thethered UAVs isn't new. Problem is probably the danger of high voltage tethers that they use.
Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla... by Buttons840 on Sunday May 29, 2016 @11:40AM (#11796713)
Why do they need a high voltage tether? They don't need a high voltage battery.
Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla... by JoeAltmaier on Sunday May 29, 2016 @11:41AM (#11796716)
To transmit power, its better to use high voltage and low current. Reduces transmission losses; uses much lighter cables. Then where the power is needed its stepped down with transformers or 'buck converters'.
Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla... by usrusr on Sunday May 29, 2016 @10:03AM (#11796393)
Thanks, those were the trigger words to conjure up an interesting Google results page.
Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla... by cm2187 on Sunday May 29, 2016 @07:20AM (#11795955)
If you need to connect them with a wire, you might as well sustain them in the air with a long stick and spare the energy.
Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla... by usrusr on Sunday May 29, 2016 @09:43AM (#11796333)
Might still be cheaper (storage, transport, setup, investment) than a crane or scaffolding when you don't need to support heavy loads. And scaling would only be limited by how much power you can push through the chain, whereas sticks need to be quite massive just to support themselves once you go beyond a few meters of length.
Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla... by nfriedly on Sunday May 29, 2016 @06:01PM (#11798431)
It's not a swarm, but I think the one drone from 3D Robotics can be tethered for essentially unlimited flight time. So that's some progress towards what you have in mind.
Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla... by kowdermeister on Sunday May 29, 2016 @07:39AM (#11795995)
True, but you also need the interface for AI, which was BD developing. Human facing AI has a serious limitation if it lives 100% in the box.