Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla...
by _up on Sunday May 29, 2016 @09:35AM
(#11796303)
The idea of Thethered UAVs isn't new. Problem is probably the danger of high voltage tethers that they use.
Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla...
by Buttons840 on Sunday May 29, 2016 @11:40AM
(#11796713)
Why do they need a high voltage tether? They don't need a high voltage battery.
Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla...
by JoeAltmaier on Sunday May 29, 2016 @11:41AM
(#11796716)
To transmit power, its better to use high voltage and low current. Reduces transmission losses; uses much lighter cables. Then where the power is needed its stepped down with transformers or 'buck converters'.
Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla...
by usrusr on Sunday May 29, 2016 @10:03AM
(#11796393)
Thanks, those were the trigger words to conjure up an interesting Google results page.
Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla...
by cm2187 on Sunday May 29, 2016 @07:20AM
(#11795955)
If you need to connect them with a wire, you might as well sustain them in the air with a long stick and spare the energy.
Re:Boston Dynamics employees were frustrated by Google's pla...
by usrusr on Sunday May 29, 2016 @09:43AM
(#11796333)
Might still be cheaper (storage, transport, setup, investment) than a crane or scaffolding when you don't need to support heavy loads. And scaling would only be limited by how much power you can push through the chain, whereas sticks need to be quite massive just to support themselves once you go beyond a few meters of length.
In a similar line of thinking, I am actually kind of surprised that there are no wired quadrocopter swarms yet, that would form a bucket line of short cables to trade range for the power and infinite endurance of a grid connection. I am quite sure that there must be applications where this deal would be worthwhile.