News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Housing in the Bay Area by davidw on Thursday May 26, 2016 @01:22AM (#11775682)
Sadly, Marin County is "the boss-level kingdom of California NIMBYs":

https://twitter.com/kimmaicutler/status/735561614368202752

Re:Housing in the Bay Area by calbear81 on Thursday May 26, 2016 @01:31AM (#11775727)
I support development but I'm kind of okay with not too much in Marin because there's no viable and fast public transit from there to SF so adding a bunch of people there doesn't make as much sense (I could also be rationalizing a bias towards keeping Marin green and "country" since I want to eventually settle down there..)

I really support development along established rail corridors along CalTrain and BART lines. There should be ridiculously tall housing towers in cheap places like Hayward and open places like Walnut Creek and Pleasanton, if only the BART was not so damn slow and so freakishly expensive.

Re:Housing in the Bay Area by mikeyouse on Thursday May 26, 2016 @01:43AM (#11775793)
Of course theres no BART in Marin due to racist local NIMBYs so there's a bit of a paradox involved.
Re:Housing in the Bay Area by aliston on Thursday May 26, 2016 @03:08AM (#11776172)
This is not historically accurate. Marin voted in favor of BART, but after San Mateo country bailed, the costs were shifted North. It was the increased costs that prevented BART from going across the Golden Gate.
Re:Housing in the Bay Area by ccarter84 on Thursday May 26, 2016 @04:02AM (#11776391)
Didn't know that, thanks for filling in that gap....I had always thought it was just Marin elitism
Re:Housing in the Bay Area by paloaltokid on Thursday May 26, 2016 @02:34AM (#11776033)
Development along the existing CalTrain and BART lines makes a lot of sense. Though it would be great if there were good public transit options in Marin, the reality is that neither CalTrain nor BART will ever go there. The development is just too expensive at this point.

Prediction: the gentrification currently happening in Oakland will soon spread to Richmond and Vallejo. Vallejo, it's crime problems aside, actually makes a lot of sense. There's a ferry there and cheap housing.

Re:Housing in the Bay Area by hollerith on Thursday May 26, 2016 @12:23PM (#11779205)
I find it a little misleading to point out that there is no CalTrain to Marin while omitting to note that there is regularly-scheduled ferry service to Marin.

The ferries are just as fast and definitely more pleasant than CalTrain. (BART though is faster, I'm pretty sure.)

Re:Housing in the Bay Area by paloaltokid on Thursday May 26, 2016 @02:57PM (#11780568)
The ferries are not a similar option to CalTrain or BART. I live in Marin and could recite you from memory the Larkspur ferry schedule without blinking. When I worked in SF my commute was tightly coupled to the ferry schedule. In addition, the ferry only stops at the ferry building. Once you're off the boat, you still have to walk/MUNI/Bart to your final destination.

Also, if you are in San Francisco after 10pm, no more ferry for you. BART, CalTrain, and Muni are all much more flexible options.

Re:Housing in the Bay Area by davidw on Thursday May 26, 2016 @01:43AM (#11775792)
I agree completely with keeping parks and other green space, but disagree with so little density in the actual built up areas.
Re:Housing in the Bay Area by rsync on Thursday May 26, 2016 @12:20PM (#11779178)
"Sadly, Marin County is "the boss-level kingdom of California NIMBYs"

Cross the bridge, take a left, and drive out to the national seashore. Have lunch in Pt. Reyes. Drive back out to the 101 through the Nicasio horse country.

Thank you, thank you, Marin County NIMBYs. Thank you.

Re:Housing in the Bay Area by davidw on Thursday May 26, 2016 @12:26PM (#11779225)
I don't think most housing advocates want to pave over parks and things like that, but want to add some options where there is already a town.

Also, as kind of an aside, Marin NIMBY's pretty much killed mountain biking in its birthplace, which I also find sad.

Re:Housing in the Bay Area by CalRobert on Thursday May 26, 2016 @06:25PM (#11782185)
Ironically the NIMBY's actions do result in massive loss of wild land, but in someone else's backyard.