News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Accounting in 2016 – Still a manual and tedious process by IshKebab on Sunday April 03, 2016 @02:09PM (#11416968)
It seems to me the bigger reason is that the best people to fix it are the ones with the biggest incentive not to.
Re:Accounting in 2016 – Still a manual and tedious process by Havoc on Sunday April 03, 2016 @02:22PM (#11417026)
> ones with the biggest incentive not to

Not really. The bank stuff (where they are REALLY still running ancient mainframes) is not changing because its a bureaucracy and they're super risk averse. And every year the conclusion is the same - limp along for another year. Plus there are cases where the tech is so old that its essentially a black box at this stage.

On the authors scale - they're are few people that have the necessary odd combination of skills (accounting & programming). And those that do don't spend their time writing SME software...they work on enterprise scale stuff.

As for no incentive to fix it - trust me nobody likes paper invoices. Not even bookkeepers. Everyone's life would be easier if there was a widely adopted standardized system in place.

Re:Accounting in 2016 – Still a manual and tedious process by toyg on Sunday April 03, 2016 @02:18PM (#11417009)
Accountants usualy don't write the legislation they have to follow. In that sense, they have no incentive one way or the other.

If you mean that the incentive is for companies to get legislation vague enough that it can be bent in different ways, I might agree, but even if they wanted to, it's really difficult to find a common way to account for both multinational biotech companies and individual stallholders in Chattanooga TN.

Re:Accounting in 2016 – Still a manual and tedious process by ambicapter on Sunday April 03, 2016 @07:03PM (#11418244)
If we follow your reasoning you could say that about any profession.